Millburn, NJ – Neighbors Protest Possible Resolution to Build Synagogue in Short Hills

    27

    Rabbi Mendel Bogomilsky at his Short Hills home on Jefferson Avenue. Bogomilsky wants to fuse two adjoining lots, tear down existing structures and build a roughly 16,000-square-foot synagogue there. Photo Credit: Alexandra Pais/New Jersey Local News Service Millburn, NJ – A possible resolution to a 15-year dispute between a Short Hills rabbi and Millburn township officials – in the shape of a 16,000-square-foot synagogue – has roused stern resistance from a group of neighbors.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Rabbi Mendel Bogomilsky and his wife, Rivkah, who also run the Chai Center for Living Judaism on Millburn Avenue, maintain they have only been hosting prayer services for friends and neighbors at their home on Jefferson Avenue.

    Township officials, though, say the Bogomilskys have been holding much larger religious services without the requisite permits.

    Plans for the synagogue, which would be built on adjoining lots off of Old Short Hills Road, grew out of an agreement between the Bogomilskys and the township following a number of legal actions, including lawsuits and countersuits.

    The lots, set among multi-million dollar mansions in the rustic Short Hills, would total less than 2 acres. The township’s zoning regulations, though, say that a house of worship can’t be built on less than 3 acres.

    The Bogomilskys’ requests to the township’s zoning board, though, have drawn the ire of a group of township residents who say that if it were approved, the synagogue would create an unwelcome precedent and allow other so-called beneficial use developments — such as housing and day-care centers — in areas not otherwise zoned for them.

    Aryeh Liwschitz, a Park Circle resident and a member of the Concerned Neighborhood Association of Millburn Township, said approving the synagogue could send a signal that the township is much too flexible when it comes to zoning issues.

    “We just feel that would set a bad precedent because other types of inherently beneficial-use properties could then creep into lots that are not zoned for them,” Liwschitz said.

    But an attorney for the Bogomilskys says the residents association — whose membership is at least one-third Jewish, according to one person associated with it — is using that rationale as a pretense for organized opposition to Orthodox Judaism.

    Philip Pfeffer said the residents’ opposition to the synagogue represents “a growing disdain” for Orthodox Judaism, one of the religions’s most traditional strains.

    “People just don’t want this sort of community in the neighborhood,” Pfeffer said. “They want to say it, but they can’t say it.”

    Michael Becker, a consultant to the residents’ association, calls that characterization grossly inaccurate.

    “It has nothing to do with religion,” Becker said. “If you wanted to build church or a nursing home on the same property, you’d have the same issue.”

    Until the zoning issue is resolved, which could happen as early as at the board’s March 15 meeting, the compromise calls for the Bogomilskys to keep prayer services at their Jefferson Avenue home small. In return, the township rescinded numerous fines it had doled out against the couple.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    27 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    I only have one small, tiny, little and unimportant question; When was the last time Jewish residents opposed the building of a Church in their neighborhood????!!!!
    So far, everytime, anywhere Jews plan to build, expand or otherwise plan to establish a Shul or Hebrew school, there’s a firestorm of opposition. Can anyone answer this question?!

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    If they were playing poker every week instead of praying, that would be fine. We, in Monsey, have “been there – done that”. What the Rabbi needs is a federal law suit where federal laws will give “religious use” a preference. Unfortunately, litigiation is expensive but with a federal claim, the winner gets his legal fees reimbursed by the municipality when the municipality loses (and they lose almost all the time – if you fight ’til the end without giving up.) The Towns can keep the fight going for 15 years – they have unlimited funds. However, under the American justice system, the party that wins is the one who can outspend the other before one side throws in the towel. If, however, the Rabbi went “all the way”, he’d get his zoning permits.

    Yehudis B.
    Yehudis B.
    14 years ago

    Mendy & Rivky – keep up the great work!

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    I live in Millburn (adjacent to Short Hills). If we wanted an Orthodox shul in our community we would have built one years ago.

    5T Resident
    5T Resident
    14 years ago

    Its the old story – “secular” Jews trying to keep frum Jews out. Its true in the 5T and its true in Short Hills.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    To # five. You were just lacking the other nine frum men to make a minyan. I lived very close to Millburn-I know how it is. Keep us posted after the shul is built and your property values double. Ill buy your how’s at currents market value and you will be put out of your misery and troubles.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    “Ill buy your how’s at currents market value and you will be put out of your misery and troubles”

    Maybe its because they are looking for a more intelligent group of yiddeshe neighbors who are literate and can write and English sentence. We really moved out here to get away from you but you follow us here anyway.

    ketzl
    ketzl
    14 years ago

    There is a law that applies to this situation. In fact, the legislation (Religious Land Use and Institutional Persons Act of 2000, is federal legislation that has enabled new style evangelical mega-churches to come to Main St. and build tax-exempt houses of worship up and down Main St. USA. This legislation has had as much impact on Wisconsin, New Hampshire, etc. as it will have on NJ or NY. The law will apply to this situation, not any particular person’s feelings. However, don’t think about it as a Jewish issue. It is an issue that concerns the separation of church and state. Why should a House of Worship have an advantage over any other institutional use in a residential neighborhood?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    Aryeh Liwschitz. I went to school with him and back then the Israeli immigrant family spelled it without the c after the s, vehamayvin yavin.

    I'm with the residents
    I'm with the residents
    14 years ago

    They don’t want a shul built on their block (a totally residential block) and that’s their right. It’ll change traffic, eliminate the quiet feel of the place. Next will be a sukkah built in the back yard. And a nursery school.

    Forget it. Find someplace where you’re wanted. I live near a shul that was built within zoning requirements. I think it’s a chillul Hashem to change beautiful Millburn into Teaneck or the Five Towns.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    after reading the comments here why would anyone want to live amongst snobs like you? (low life)