New York -Most everyone has heard of Tu B’Av.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
The single young ladies all wore special gowns of white. The purpose was to woo a groom, and the white indicated that they were free from sin. Indeed, the Braisah in Taanis (31a) states that the custom was for everyone to borrow white clothing from others so that the poorer girls who, in truth, lacked the financial means to clothe themselves properly, would not be embarrassed that they did not have something to wear. Indeed, even the king’s daughter and the Kohain Gadol’s daughter exchanged clothing.
So now we know what occurred on this day. But why was it established initially?
The Gemorah in Bava Basra (121a,b) provides a number of different reasons:
1. Rav Yehuda in the name of Shmuel: A law existed while we were in the desert after we had left Egypt. This law banned the Shvatim from marrying one another where it would cause changes in an inheritance. This law was rescinded in the 40th year on the 15th of Av. The joy inherent in rescinding this law caused the day to become very special and joyous.
2. Rabba Bar Bar Chana in the name of Rav Yochanan: The Tribe of Binyomin was allowed to marry into K’hal Yisroel after the incident of Pilegesh B’Givah (see Shoftim 19-21). This occurred on the 15th and signified once again the unity of Israel.
3. Rav Dimi Bar Yosef in the name of Rav Nachman: The people in the Midbar stopped dying on this day.
4. Ullah: It was the day that Hoshea Ben Ellah undid the orchards that Yeravam placed to block passage of those who wished to visit the Beis HaMikdash.
5. Rav Masna: It was the day that the Romans allowed the victims of Beitar to be buried and it was revealed that their bodies had miraculously shown no de-composure.
6. It was the day that the cutting of the wood for the main altar in the Bais HaMikdash was finished – so it celebrated that Mitzvah and allowed them to learn.
There is a historical question, however, with reason number five – that proposed by Rav Masna. The sources quoted in the Gemorah indicate that Tu B’Av was observed during the time of the Bais HaMikdash. This is borne out from the Braisah having mentioned above that the king’s daughter and the Kohain Gadol’s daughter also partook in the exchange of clothing.
But Beitar only fell after the Hadrian came to power! This was many years after the Bais HaMikdash was destroyed! Hadrian was emperor from 117 CE to 138 CE. The Bais HaMikdash was destroyed in 70 CE. How could Rav Masna explain the reason for its establishment after it was observed?
One possible answer may be that each of these opinions listed subscribes to a multiplicity of reasons why Tu B’Av was actually observed. Perhaps they actually do not argue with each other, and all these reasons existed. Indeed, this is what the Rashbam on 121a (“Yom Shehutar”) seems to imply.
Another possible response to this problem is found in the Gvuras Ari (Taanis 31a). He seems to disagree with the aforementioned Rashbam and writes that the Braisah in Taanis only actually refers to Yom Kippur and not Tu B’Av [See statement of Rabbi Shimon Ben Gamliel in the Mishna in Taanis (26b): Israel never had grander days than Yom Kippur and Tu B’Av.]
There are difficulties with both answers. Rav Masna seems to say that the reason it was established was because of his reason – while he may agree that the other things happened on that day – that was not the reason it was established in his view. The Rashbam’s answer would thus require some further understanding.
The Gvuras Ari’s response is difficult to say as well because the authorial intent of the Braisah in Taanis seems to be applying the idea to Tu B’Av as well. While one could say that it is lav davka, this is difficult to propose. There is no symmetry that is generally associated with an answer of lav davka.
Perhaps a different answer might be that the Simcha – the joy of Tu B’Av was initiated in two separate stages. Stage one was prior to the destruction of Beitar. Tu B’Av was instituted during the time of the Bais HaMikdash as a special shidduch Chesed day. It did not have a particularly joyous significance – rather – it was a propitious time to get people married. This “Shidduch Day” was replete with Chessed. But it’s primary purpose was not to commemorate any of the other incidents.
Much later, it also happened to be that on this day, the fallen of Beitar were allowed to be buried.
Coincidence?
No, not at all. There is no coincidence. According to Rav Masna, the Rabbis re-evaluated the days mentioned in Megilas Taanis, and knew that something extraordinary happened here. The special Chessed of that day – allowed for and enabled another chessed – that the fallen of Beitar could be buried, and to the delight of their brethren – their bodies did not decompose. A recognition of this chessed caused a renewal in the 15th of Av. It would be filled with renewed purpose.
This was stage two of Tu B’Av.
When did this happen chronologically? The Yerushalmi (Taanis 4:5) states that 52 years after the destruction of the Bais HaMikdash, Beitar was destroyed. This would be in 122 CE. The Gemorah in Gittin 57a gives us the background. The people of Beitar had the custom of planting a tree upon the birth of each child. Upon the engagement of two Beitar children, they would cut down the trees that were planted and would build a Chupah. One time the Roman emperor’s daughter passed by Beitar and her chariot broke down. Her servants cut down a tree that a Beitar resident had planted for his son’s wedding.
The people of Beiter beat up the emperor’s daughter’s servants. The emperor was furious and commanded that they be wiped out. The Yerushalmi indicates that it ended when the next Emperor took over. It is not clear, however, whether the Bavli agrees to the dates of the Yerushalmi.
But getting back to this new approach in understanding Rav Masna – that Tu B’Av had two stages: the first a “Chessed Day” during the time of the Bais HaMikdash and the second stage – a time when this day was enacted by later Chazal as a remarkable Yom Tov- is there a lesson that can be learned?
It would seem that when Chessed is done on a particular day, it creates Kochos and forces within the day itself that will have positive repercussions on that day ever onward. We find this idea in the Michtav M’Eliyahu as well, that time travels in a circle and not straight down. The chessed and Mitzvos imbued on a particular day, change that day forever afterward. Let us keep this in mind for Yahrtzeits, Yomim Tovim, etc. The chessed done on that day has ramifications for that day forever onward.
This, is a lesson that we can carry with us about this holiday of Tu B’Av – throughout the year. Chessed is forever.
The author can be reached at [email protected]
When I was in Yeshiva Tu B’av was taught only as reason 5. The day that the chopping of wood was finished and there was extra time to learn. We added fifteen minutes to seder.
I guess chessed,achdus and not humiliating the poor were taboo subjects in our yeshiva.
thanx vin 4 this nice
dvar torah
can we have some more
on parsha each week
also scedule of shiurim
in summer nights
Where were the shadchonim?
You mean the girls dressed alike not to diffrentiate between the rich and poor? you mean, the girks didn’t have to promise 5-10 years of support? when did that start?
Wait a second – the yidishe girls got dressed up to look beautiful for the men?? That’s not z’tnious!! They must have done it wrong during the times of the Bais HaMikdosh. Everyone now days know that it is asir min hatoira for young girls to make themselves too beautiful to attract men – the men could be NICHSHAL C”V or even worse, have hirhurim r’aim while trying to learn.
Besides – what’s the point of getting dressed up – it’s not like the Buchrim are allowed to talk to the girls c”v (like goyim l’havdil).
Just stand behind the mechitzah and wait until you get set up with someone you may or may not like. And then get engaged after 4 dates. And live happily ever after.
Imagine today if girls and boys met at an outing and the girls danced to attract. We , however , have mechitzos at weddings , many sheva brochot , bar- mitzvahs and Shabbos kiddush-lunches. Boys seen talking to girls are ostracized and thrown out of yeshivas. The doros are getting shvacher .
I have question, if anybody heard, what exactly was going on in the vineyards?
Girls were calling out to boys to looks at them and ….
In the vineyards? It’s not the most tzniusdik place.
After some talking they would go home like bride and groom?
A very serious misconception is that we can take agadate at face vale and paskin from that. Not every minhag of klal yisroel has been taken forward exactly as it was 2500 years ago. Besides even if we say that this was exactly what happened, this was when the girls and boys had absolutely pure minds and had nothing in mind but klal yisroel and avdus hashem. Go back 60 and 50 years ago and you’ll also see that the interaction between even chasidish girls and boys was so completely different than today. Torah is eternal but not every fence that was built back then remains the same. Many fences became taller and more sturdy because the “gasse” became more tumoh and corrupted.
Listen to Rabbi Miller #230 for a good explanation for all these “questions”… The dor was completely different. You know the Vilnar Gaon said, he can imagine a tana but not a pusheta yid during bais shaini. We have no idea at all of their fire and ideallism for Yiddishkait that burned in their hearts.
In fact, the bnos yisroel said AL TITEN EYNACH BEYOFI, do not judge by beauty rather judge by pedigree! (so you might ask if that’s the case why did they dress nicely? Well #230 … not enough room to write)
May Hashem light up our eyes to look at Tu B’av with the proper reverence which spelled out the greatness of our nation
maybe we wouldn’t have such a shidduch crisis if we would do the same nowadays!
I beg to differ with most of the above. How do we say that the physical elements were any different then,- by being out the girls would attract simply by being themselves; after all, they switched dressed so no one could judge them by their clothes. Can’t we look at it on a simplistic level and say it was a day to attract a mate and that’s how it was done?
there is nothing wrong with dressing beautifully- the problem is when its untznius and provocative- there is a world of a difference.