Austin – Texas House Bans TSA Offensive Security Pat-Downs

    16

    Austin, TX – The Texas House passed a bill that would make it a criminal offense for public servants to inappropriately touch travelers during airport security pat-downs.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Approved late Thursday night, the measure makes it illegal for anyone conducting searches to touch “the anus, sexual organ, buttocks, or breast of another person” including through clothing.

    It also prohibits searches “that would be offensive to a reasonable person.”

    The bill’s chief sponsor is Republican Rep. David Simpson, who said, “this has to do with dignity and travel, and prohibiting indecent, groping searches.”

    He believes it will keep Transportation Security Administration officials from treating travelers like criminals, though the measure may be superseded by federal law.

    After a brief but raucous debate, lawmakers approved the measure with little opposition — drawing applause from supporters.

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group
    16 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    couldbe
    couldbe
    15 years ago

    So the terrorists will fly from texas now?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    15 years ago

    “although it MAY be superceded by Federal law”???

    Even a first year law student would tell you that a state cannot regulate how federal security officers employed by (or under contract to) the TSA do their jobs. The first time they tried to interfere, a federal marshall would place take the local sherrif into custody.

    charliehall
    charliehall
    15 years ago

    The next Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab will be sure to get on a plane in Texas.

    Anon Ibid Opcit
    Anon Ibid Opcit
    15 years ago

    Ridiculous. The law can’t be applied. And if there’s probable cause to do a search those are the areas most likely to hide contraband.

    georgewashingtonbridge
    georgewashingtonbridge
    15 years ago

    This is going to be fun. First, I doubt that it will have any real effect, since state laws cannot regulate federal activities. Secondly, if TSA employees in Texas stop performing pat downs: Anyone flying out of Texas who refuses a whole-body scan will probably be prevented from entering the boarding area. That’s going to create a lot of angry Texans. And I would -not- want to be near a crowd of angry people whose idea of “luxury car” is a Lincoln Continental with a rifle rack.

    pbalaw
    pbalaw
    15 years ago

    Your all missing the point , whether this will work by itself is not the point, it sheeds light on a bog problem that we have with the TSA, my cousin just traveled with his family and got the FULL pat down in from of all… This is crazy… It’s a good thing that Texas did this, we should all follow

    15 years ago

    Support this. Having been told by TSA agents in JFK airport who had removed my baby’s diaper and were poking around with their fat blue-gloved fingers that if I don’t stop crying I would be put under arrest, I believe, we have gone too far.
    For those who think it’s just fabulous that TSA agents have carte blanch to do whatever they want, I ask, is ANYTHING off limits? Or in the name of preventing terror can they do anything? Naked strip search of kids, like we were subject to? Body cavity searches? Or do you believe, as I do, that with all good ideas and good laws, there must be limits? Do you think the FBI can just wiretap anyone’s phone? Laws must necessarily come with limits.

    allmark
    allmark
    15 years ago

    To those who attack the very idea of preventing the TSA from doing whatever it wants in the name of security, please be aware that governments also justify taking the people’s freedom by arguing it is for security.

    The very reason the Constitution has a 4th amendment making some searches illegal is to prevent the government from doing whatever it wants.

    The choice is only whether the TSA uses legal or illegal means to protect us.

    Aryeh
    Aryeh
    15 years ago

    This does not impair searches “for cause”