Washington – Rival Plans To Cut Spending: The Details

    3

    Democratic Senator from Nevada Harry Reid, along with Democratic Senator from New York Chuck Schumer (L), holds a news conference on his debt limit proposal in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on 25 July, 2011. Democrats and Republicans are racing to create rival budget backup plans, a departure from the grand bargain that Obama had been pushing.  EPA/JIM LO SCALZOWashington – Senate Democrats and House Republicans are pushing rival plans to reduce future budget deficits and avert a potential government default next week. Neither plan raises taxes or cuts major benefit programs such as Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    ___

    The plan by Senate Democrats would cut spending by $2.7 trillion over the next decade, while increasing the government’s ability to borrow by $2.4 trillion.

    — Extends borrowing authority through 2012.

    — Cuts $1.2 trillion from discretionary programs. These are the day-to-day operating budgets, grants and programs of government agencies, such as the Interior, Education Justice and Defense departments and the Environmental Protection Agency.

    — Claims savings of $1 trillion from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    — Saves $400 billion from lower interest payments.

    — Cuts $100 billion from mandatory programs, including agriculture, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Includes savings from reducing waste, fraud and abuse.

    — Creates a bipartisan legislative committee to recommend future cuts, with a guarantee that if the panel can agree on a plan, it will receive a vote in Congress.

    ___

    The plan by House Republicans would reduce spending by $1.2 trillion over 10 years, while increasing the government’s ability to borrow by about $1 trillion.

    — Extends borrowing authority until about February.

    — All cuts would come from the day-to-day operating budgets of government agencies, known as discretionary programs.

    — Imposes caps on future spending.

    — Requires the House and Senate to vote on — but not necessarily pass — a balanced budget constitutional amendment by the end of 2011.

    — Creates a bipartisan legislative committee to recommend $1.8 trillion in future cuts to programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, in exchange for increasing the government’s ability to borrow an additional $1.6 trillion.

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group

    3 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    PowerUp
    PowerUp
    14 years ago

    So both plans don’t raise taxes and the damocrats are cutting more then the republican, but its a trap from the damocrates full of gimmicks and I hope they don’t fall for it.

    14 years ago

    why do the cuts need to be over a decade? so many reasons politicaly but none fiscally.