San Francisco, CA – A San Francisco judge said Wednesday she intends to strike a ban on male circumcision from the city’s November ballot.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi said in a tentative ruling that the proposed law prohibiting circumcision of male children violates a California law that makes regulating medical procedures a function of the state, not cities.
“It serves no legitimate purpose to allow a measure whose invalidity can be determined as a matter of law to remain on the ballot,” Giorgi wrote.
Giorgi ordered San Francisco’s elections director to remove the controversial measure from the ballot that would have made the city the first in the nation to hold a public vote on whether to outlaw the circumcision of minors.
The citizens’ initiative, which made the ballot in May after supporters gathered the required 7,163 signatures, would have made the practice a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 or up to one year in jail.
The initiative did not offer exemptions for religious rituals such as the Jewish bris or Muslim khitan.
The San Francisco city attorney’s office, which had joined several Jewish organizations in challenging the ban in court, said Giorgi plans to hear arguments on the issue Thursday before making her ruling final.
The ban’s sponsor, anti-circumcision activist Lloyd Schofield, did not immediately respond to a telephone call and email from The Associated Press seeking comment.
Backers had argued the ban was necessary to prevent a form of genital mutilation from being forced on children.
Critics contended the initiative posed a threat to constitutionally protected religious freedoms and cited comic books and trading cards distributed by the measure’s proponents that carried images of a blonde, blue-eyed superhero and four evil Jewish characters.
Though state law prohibits cities and counties from regulating medical procedures, two California Assembly members have introduced a bill that would specifically pre-empt local governments from enacting laws regarding male circumcision.
who ever believed that this will happen in the USA, things like this belong to communist counties not to land of freedom, we should all stand up and fight this law, maybe someone should open a website to gather partitions to send to our dear friend Hussain Obama to help out
Let it be on the ballot, in a recent poll it was going to get crushed.
Even if the measure would have been overwhelmingly defeated, its very appearance on a formal ballot would have represented a victory for these perverted activists.
It would have given them legitimacy that will ultimately lead to more widespread acceptance of the notion that circumcision falls into the category of “mutilation,” and it provide activists an opening to label circumcision proponents “not-yet-enlightened.”
Hordes of mindless followers of the progressive mindset would flinch at the thought of being labeled “unenlightened” and ultimately jump on board. In time, the question of whether or not circumcision is wrong, it would be considered an accepted fact, and those who fight to allow it motivated by a nefarious agenda.
This judge has done a great favor to those who demand the right to choose circumcision, but I’m afraid this is not the last time this issue will be raised.