Washington – When the Obama administration wanted to be certain that Congress would not block $50 million in new aid to the Palestinian Authority last month, it turned to a singularly influential lobbyist: Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
At the request of the American Embassy and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Mr. Netanyahu urged dozens of members of Congress visiting Israel last month not to object to the aid, according to Congressional and diplomatic officials. Mr. Netanyahu’s intervention with Congress underscored an extraordinary intersection of American diplomacy and domestic politics, the result of an ever-tightening relationship between the Israeli government and the Republican Party that now controls the House.
On Tuesday, one of President Obama’s potential rivals in 2012, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, delivered a speech in New York criticizing Mr. Obama’s stance toward Israel as “naïve, arrogant, misguided and dangerous.” Mr. Perry said that he would be a guest soon of Danny Danon, the hard-right deputy speaker of the Israeli Parliament.
One of the members of Congress who attended the meeting with Mr. Netanyahu in August, Representative Michael G. Grimm of New York, a Republican, said that it was carefully explained to the delegation that the money would be used for training Palestinian police officers who work closely with the Israeli government.
Mr. Grimm said he felt more comfortable receiving the explanation from the prime minister than from Obama administration officials.
“I think the credibility is different,” he said, “in the sense that this is his country and he certainly would not support something that would have negative effects within his country.”
For the Republicans, the relationship with the Israeli government has created what many see as an opportunity. Mindful of Mr. Obama’s strained relationship with Mr. Netanyahu and emboldened by a special election victory last week in a heavily Jewish Congressional district in New York, Republicans hope the tensions between Mr. Obama and Israel – underscored by the latest developments at the United Nations – will help propel future political victories for their party.
Even as Mrs. Clinton continued this week to pursue what she called “extremely intensive ongoing diplomacy” to find a compromise between the Israelis and the Palestinians, Republicans sought to leverage support among Jewish voters here at home who traditionally have favored Democrats.
The National Republican Congressional Committee has drawn up a list of several Democrat-rich Congressional districts – including one on Long Island now held by Representative Steve Israel, who leads a rival Democratic group – where it believes Republicans have a fighting chance by appealing to Jewish voters.
“Even as Mrs. Clinton continued this week to pursue what she called “extremely intensive ongoing diplomacy” to find a compromise between the Israelis and the Palestinians…”
Is she stupid? Has she ever stated that as long as they use terror, they will never receive a penny in aid (even “humanitarian”), and will not be accepted as a party in any discussions whatsoever? If we keep on conducting “dialogue” while atrocities continue, we are accepting violence, murder, and genocide. This is morally corrupt, and the Muslim entities that have achieved this are gloating in their victory. It is a major step in legitimizing the erasure of Israel from the map, and the persecution of Jews world over. Its the Nazi approach all over again, but it is labeled diplomacy.
Phooey!
Well well well…Obama needs Israel’s approval for it’s dealings vis-a-vis the Palestinians. I guess the shoe’s on the other foot now.