Detroit – Federal investigators say the autonomous Uber SUV that struck and killed an Arizona pedestrian in March spotted the woman about six seconds before hitting her, but didn’t stop because emergency braking was disabled.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
In a preliminary report on the crash, the National Transportation Safety Board said Thursday that emergency braking maneuvers are not enabled while Uber’s cars are under computer control, “to reduce the potential for erratic vehicle behavior.”
Instead, Uber relies on a human backup driver to intervene. The system, however, is not designed to alert the driver.
In the crash, the driver began steering less than a second before impact but didn’t brake until less than a second after impact, according to the preliminary report, which does not determine fault.
A video of the crash showed the driver looking down just before the vehicle struck and killed 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg in Tempe, Arizona.
An Uber spokeswoman would not comment immediately on the report. She said the company is a party to the NTSB investigation and cannot release information.
Sensors on the fully autonomous Volvo XC-90 SUV spotted Herzberg while the car was traveling 43 miles per hour and determined that braking was needed 1.3 seconds before impact, according to the report.
Herzberg was pushing a bicycle across a boulevard in the darkness of March 18 when the crash occurred on a part of the road that had no crosswalk and was not lighted, the report said.
She was wearing dark clothing and did not look in the direction of the vehicle until just before impact. A toxicology report showed that she tested positive for methamphetamine and marijuana, according to the NTSB.
Also, the bicycle had no side reflectors and the front and back reflectors were perpendicular to the Uber SUV.
I may not be an engineer but I know that that is the dumbest setup. Autonomous driving without emergency breaking? Are you joking? They should be sued out of existence. No second chances to kill someone else. If it drives by itself, it should stop itself!
My comment was not political. If anything, it calls for more regulation- typically left-leaning. Altough, this ahould not be political. It is crazy to think that a self-driving car would have an option to not brake for a person in its path. Such a mess up is inexcusable. It should be vehicular homicide for whoever knowingly wrote the program. And the company should have to pay anlimited amount in wrongful death. Such errors are inexcusable!!! Imagine if it hapoened to someone you cared for.