Dangerous New Bill Proposed in New York Giving Cuomo Extraordinary Powers

29

by Rabbi Yair Hoffman for 5tjt.com

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


There is no question that the safety of New Yorkers is paramount – and, as a general rule, we should encourage steps that improve the safety of the residents of this state.  However, we have to be careful to ensure that we not over empower people and officials that do not have such a good track record in terms of overstepping their bounds.

There is a bill that has been presented which purports to amend the public health law, in relation to the removal of cases, contacts and carriers of communicable diseases who are potentially dangerous to the public health.

The bill essentially allows the governor of New York and or his people to forcibly remove from their homes – anyone who he deems a health risk to the public.  The governor would be empowered to do so with one single order.  

This means that they or their children can be forcibly detained to a medical facility or other type of facility.  The bill is sponsored by New York State Assemblyman Noah Nicholas Perry and is called Bill A416.

In this author’s view, this bill constitutes a grave danger to both democracy and the civil rights of New York residents.  This can present significant problems in Kashrus observance, Shabbos observance, and numerous other areas of halacha.

Readers are encouraged to contact their representatives to protest this bill. You can contact the sponsor, Assemblyman Perry’s office at 718-385-3336 (903 Utica Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203)
or email here: https://nyassembly.gov/mem/N-Nick-Perry/contact/

 

The pr

unlikely to gain any traction in Albany

NYS Assembly Bill A.416 draws criticism from Republicans

ALBANY.jpeg
By: Jeff RusackPosted at 6:23 PM, Jan 04, 2021 and last updated 12:26 AM, Jan 05, 2021
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WKBW) — Republican lawmakers in New York are crying foul over a piece of legislation that would give state and county leaders the ability to detain contagious patients during a state of emergency.

The bill is Assembly Bill 416. While it’s making the rounds on social media now, it was originally proposed in 2015 during the Ebola outbreak and has never once been heard by committee. It has been introduced in the 2015-2016, 2017-2018, 2019-2020 legislative sessions, and the current session.

The bill is described as:

“An act to amend the public health law, in relation to the removal of cases, contacts and carriers of communicable diseases who are potentially dangerous to the public health.”

The bill goes on to read:

Upon determining by clear and convincing evidence that the health of others is or may be endangered by a case, contact or carrier, or suspected case, contact or carrier of a contagious disease that, in the opinion of the governor, after consultation with the commissioner, may pose an imminent and significant threat to the public health resulting in severe morbidity or high mortality, the governor or his or her delegee, including, but not limited to the commissioner or the heads of local health departments, may order the removal and/or detention of such a person or of a group of such persons by issuing a single order, identifying such persons either by name or by a reasonably specific description of the individuals or group being detained. Such person or group of persons shall be detained in a medical facility or other appropriate facility or premises designated by the governor or his or her delegee.

UPDATES: ACCORDING TO AGUDAH:

Boruch hashem for Agudah.  It seems that there is no need for alarm.

This bill was actually introduced in 2015 in response to the Ebola crisis. Each year thousands of bills are introduced in Albany and the vast majority never even get a hearing let alone get passed and signed into law. They sit there and get automatically renewed each session. This is one of those bills. In six years it has not gotten a single hearing does not have a single co sponsor and there is no companion Senate Bill, a prerequisite for any passage. In short this bill is going nowhere and this whole campaign is mass hysteria.

ACCORDING TO WKBW.COM

The wording of this bill worries lawmakers like Assemblyman Steve Hawley, a Republican from Batavia.

“Protecting the health of our neighbors is a noble goal to be certain, but this bill forfeits our constitutional liberty in a way we can never allow,” said Hawley in a media release.

“In my opinion, just introducing these bills creates a negative impact that ultimately harms the effort to get our state past the pandemic, safely,” said Senator George Borello, a Republican who represents, Chautauqua, Cattaraugus and Allegany counties.

The bill was introduced by Assemblyman Nick Perry from Brooklyn. The bill was written in 2015 after a woman refused to quarantine after working closely with patients who had Ebola.

Perry wrote this on his Facebook page on Sunday regarding a416:

“Somewhere in the future there may be the need for people to protect from a person or persons carrying a very deadly and transmittable virus, and this bill is designed to ensure that our government could lawfully act protect all the people.

I am open to amendments that would address real concerns raised by critics and will quite happily accept suggestions that will improve the bill in regard to concerns to constitutional rights.”
Assemblyman Nick Perry
You can read his full statement here:

The governor is specifically mentioned in the bill as having power to detain contagious patients.

According to an adviser of Governor Andrew Cuomo, the governor never knew this bill existed.

“It apparently is six years old, has no Senate sponsor and has never moved out of committee. We have real problems to focus on and I urge the crazy uncles who are fueling this cut rate Qanon – and the politicians pandering to them — to knock it off, turn off Proud Boy Twitter and take a walk or something,” wrote Rich Azzopardi Senior Advisor to the Governor.

To get a sense of just how many bills are proposed and never make it out of committee, in the 2019-2020 session 7,982 assembly bills didn’t make it out of committee. In the New York State Senate, 6,098 didn’t make it out of committee. In that same time period, 753 bills were signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo.

The proposed text of the bill is as follows:

STATE OF NEW YORK

416

2021-2022 Regular Sessions

IN ASSEMBLY
(Prefiled)

January 6, 2021

Introduced by M. of A. PERRY — read once and referred to the Committee on Health

AN ACT to amend the public health law, in relation to the removal of cases, contacts and carriers of communicable diseases who are potentially dangerous to the public health

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. The public health law is amended by adding a new section 2120-a to read as follows: § 2120-a. Removal and detention of cases, contacts and carriers who are or may be a danger to public health; other orders.

1. The provisions of this section shall be utilized in the event that the governor declares a state of health emergency due to an epidemic of any communicable disease.

2. Upon determining by clear and convincing evidence that the health of others is or may be endangered by a case, contact or carrier, or suspected case, contact or carrier of a contagious disease that, in the opinion of the governor, after consultation with the commissioner, may pose an imminent and significant threat to the public health resulting in severe morbidity or high mortality, the governor or his or her delegee, including, but not limited to the commissioner or the heads of local health departments, may order the removal and/or detention of such a person or of a group of such persons by issuing a single order, identifying such persons either by name or by a reasonably specific description of the individuals or group being detained. Such person or group of persons shall be detained in a medical facility or other appropriate facility or premises designated by the governor or his or her delegee and complying with subdivision five of this section.

3. A person or group removed or detained by order of the governor or his or her delegee pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall be detained for such period and in such manner as the department may direct in accordance with this section.

4. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of this section:

(a) A confirmed case or a carrier who is detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall not continue to be detained after the department determines that such person is no longer contagious.

(b) A suspected case or suspected carrier who is detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall not continue to be detained after the department determines, with the exercise of due diligence, that such person is not infected with or has not been exposed to such a disease, or if infected with or exposed to such a disease, no longer is or will become contagious.

(c) A person who is detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section as a contact of a confirmed case or a carrier shall not continue to be detained after the department determines that the person is not infected with the disease or that such contact no longer presents a potential danger to the health of others.

(d) A person who is detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section as a contact of a suspected case shall not continue to be detained:

(i) after the department determines, with the exercise of due diligence, that the suspected case was not infected with such a disease, or was not contagious at the time the contact was exposed to such individual; or

(ii) after the department determines that the contact no longer presents a potential danger to the health of others.

5. A person who is detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall, as is appropriate to the circumstances:

(a) have his or her medical condition and needs assessed and addressed on a regular basis, and
(b) be detained in a manner that is consistent with recognized isolation and infection control principles in order to minimize the likelihood of transmission of infection to such person and to others.
6. When a person or group is ordered to be detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section for a period not exceeding three business days, such person or member of such group shall, upon request, be afforded an opportunity to be heard. If a person or group detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section needs to be detained beyond three business days, they shall be provided with an additional commissioner’s order pursuant to subdivisions two and eight of this section.
7. When a person or group is ordered to be detained pursuant to subdivision two of this section for a period exceeding three business days, and such person or member of such group requests release, the governor or his or her delegee shall make an application for a court order authorizing such detention within three business days after such request by the end of the first business day following such Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, which application shall include a request for an expedited hearing. After any such request for release, detention shall not continue for more than five business days in the absence of a court order authorizing detention. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, in no event shall any person be detained for more than sixty days without a court order authorizing such detention. The governor or his or her delegee shall seek further court review of such detention within ninety days following the initial court order authorizing detention and thereafter within ninety days of each subsequent court review. In any court proceeding to enforce an order of the governor or his or her delegee for the removal or detention of a person or group issued pursuant to this subdivision or for review of the continued detention of a person or group, the governor or his or her delegee shall prove the particularized
circumstances constituting the necessity for such detention by clear and convincing evidence.

8. (a) A copy of any detention order of the governor or his or her delegee issued pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall be given to each detained individual; however, if the order applies to a group of individuals and it is impractical to provide individual copies, it may be posted in a conspicuous place in the detention premises. Any detention order of the commissioner issued pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall set forth:

(i) the purpose of the detention and the legal authority under which the order is issued, including the particular sections of this article or other law or regulation;

(ii) a description of the circumstances and/or behavior of the detained person or group constituting the basis for the issuance of the order;

(iii) the less restrictive alternatives that were attempted and were unsuccessful and/or the less restrictive alternatives that were considered and rejected, and the reasons such alternatives were rejected;

(iv) a notice advising the person or group being detained that they have a right to request release from detention, and including instructions on how such request shall be made;

(v) a notice advising the person or group being detained that they have a right to be represented by legal counsel and that upon request of such person or group access to counsel will be facilitated to the extent feasible under the circumstances; and

(vi) a notice advising the person or group being detained that they may supply the addresses and/or telephone numbers of friends and/or relatives to receive notification of the person’s detention, and that the department shall, at the detained person’s request and to the extent feasible, provide notice to a reasonable number of such people that the person is being detained.

(b) In addition, an order issued pursuant to subdivisions two and seven of this section, requiring the detention of a person or group for a period exceeding three business days, shall:
(i) advise the person or group being detained that the detention shall not continue for more than five business days after a request for release has been made in the absence of a court order authorizing such detention;
(ii) advise the person or group being detained that, whether or not they request release from detention, the governor or his or her delegee must obtain a court order authorizing detention within sixty days following the commencement of detention and thereafter must further seek court review of the detention within ninety days of such court order and within ninety days of each subsequent court review; and

(iii) advise the person or group being detained that they have the right to request that legal counsel be provided, that upon such request counsel shall be provided if and to the extent possible under the circumstances, and that if counsel is so provided, that such counsel will be notified that the person or group has requested legal representation.

9. A person who is detained in a medical facility, or other appropriate facility or premises, shall not conduct himself or herself in disorderly manner, and shall not leave or attempt to leave such facility or premises until he or she is discharged pursuant to this section.

10. Where necessary and feasible under the circumstances, language interpreters and persons skilled in communicating with vision and hearing impaired individuals shall be provided.

11. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the issuance of orders pursuant to § 11.21 of the New York City Health Code.

12. In addition to the removal or detention orders referred to in subdivision two of this section, and without affecting or limiting any other authority that the commissioner may otherwise have, the governor or his or her delegee may, in his or her discretion, issue and seek enforcement of any other orders that he or she determines are necessary or appropriate to prevent dissemination or transmission of contagious diseases or other illnesses that may pose a threat to the public health including, but not limited to, orders requiring any person or persons who are not in the custody of the department to be excluded; to remain isolated or quarantined at home or at a premises of such person’s choice that is acceptable to the department and under such conditions and for such period as will prevent transmission of the contagious disease or other illness; to require the testing or medical examination of persons who may have been exposed to or infected by a contagious disease or who may have been exposed to or contaminated with dangerous amounts of radioactive materials or toxic chemicals; to require an individual who has been exposed to or infected by a contagious disease to complete an appropriate, prescribed course of treatment, preventive medication or vaccination, including directly observed therapy to treat the disease and follow infection control provisions for the disease; or to require an individual who has been contaminated with dangerous amounts of radioactive materials or toxic chemicals such that said individual may present a danger to others, to undergo decontamination procedures deemed necessary by the department. Such person or persons shall, upon request, be afforded an opportunity to be heard, but the provisions of subdivisions two through eleven of this section shall not otherwise
apply.

13. The provisions of this section shall not be construed to permit or require the forcible administration of any medication without a prior court order.

§ 2. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law. Effective immediately the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or before such date.

The author can be reached at [email protected]


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


29 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Educated Archy
Educated Archy
3 years ago

This is why the Trump handling of covid was so important . We need someone to protect our civil rights or it won’t Stop at covid. It’s the essence of who we are and we should almost never trample it. Coumo already abused his power via yeshivagate. Much worse than bridgegate . He must be impeached .

Biden not my president, he’s a cheater
Biden not my president, he’s a cheater
3 years ago

The dem-o-rat party is evil. And you people support this. Feh. Shameful
Coumo is one very bad dude. He has blood in his hand. He’s a horrible evil person and toy guys support him. Feh

Stam Misha
Stam Misha
3 years ago

soon they will be able to grab anyone deemed as unhealthy for public well being and send them to re-education camps, just like in china.

Shimy
Shimy
3 years ago

Surprised such a police state order can even be brought up. You basically can be plucked off the streets. Have we lost our minds?

Apple
Apple
3 years ago

Rotten apple

Franki
Franki
3 years ago

They used a profile pic that makes him look like batmansjoker

Marcia
Marcia
3 years ago

VIN misrepresents the meaning of the article by saying it is a “new” bill. Since it was established in 2015 for an Ebola case, this is most definitely not new.

CudahyKid
CudahyKid
3 years ago

Is that the only photo you could find?

ProminantLawyer
ProminantLawyer
3 years ago

Move out. Flee.
Delblazio and Como say bp, willyb, ch….are hotspots. But when it comes to giving vacines in those hotspots….they dont. Charlene is in charge. Ha! LMAO

Rabbi Dr. Bernhard Rosenberg
Rabbi Dr. Bernhard Rosenberg
3 years ago

concentration camps to murder people. rabbi bernhard rosenberg speak out against this.

Nu?
Nu?
3 years ago

Of course Trump and Cuomo mishandled the pandemic. They’re politicians.

If they had brains and ethics, they would be doctors instead.

Rachel Heineman
Rachel Heineman
3 years ago

We should be grateful that the Governor is looking out for us. And by the way VIN, the photo you chose shows extreme prejudice.

Charles B Hall
Charles B Hall
3 years ago

So much for the Republican Party being pro-life.

Charles B Hall
Charles B Hall
3 years ago

this bill constitutes a grave danger to both democracy and the civil rights of New York residents”

The danger to democracy was last Wednesday’s violent coup attempt.

Judaism isn’t about rights it is about obligations. How about something from the Rabbi about how people have an obligation to stop being irresponsible about their risky behavior that can spread this deadly virus?

Judith
Judith
3 years ago

There already is such a thing with TB , Ebola and other diseases . It can be useful if not abused . There are many infected people who don’t follow directives voluntarily .