Judge Overturns Biden Extension

54

Special to Vinnews

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


WASHINGTON DC – It is music to the ears of some landlords, even if they are keeping the second half of Sefirah.  On the other hand, it is disturbing to many that have been adversely effected by the pandemic.

In a twenty page ruling, Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled that the Department of Health and Human Services exceeded its authority when it imposed a freeze on evictions.

In other words, the CDC cannot stop landlords from evicting tenants that aren’t paying their rent.

The ruling was issued on Wednesday afternoon.

Hundreds of thousands of landlords across the country have what to celebrate.  Until now, they were responsible to pay their own mortgages, while some tenants who were taking advantage of the situation – living rent free.  This situation has changed.  On the other hand it could be disappointing news to those who have lost so much on account of the pandemic.

The ruling may also be good news for lawyers who specialize in evictions.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


54 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Aron1
Active Member
Aron1
2 years ago

I think it is very wrong of VIN to paint with a broad brush all of these tenants as “Ganoovim”. There are many that are truly struggling. Just because the government made an edict restricting evictions does not make ALL of these tenants “Ganoovim”.

Cynthia Lamarr
Cynthia Lamarr
2 years ago

99% of Tenants have their jobs and got stimulus and are much better off than before the pandemic. They owe rent for a year prior the pandemic, and if they are struggling, the Goverment should pay their rent. The owner of the house/building does not have to have them living for free.

Shmuel
Shmuel
2 years ago

Even vis-a-vis those tenants who are truly struggling, their landlords have no obligation to suffer for them and lose their livelyhoods.

my real name
my real name
2 years ago

So there is rejoicing that people who have lost their parnasah will be put out on the street? Since when is achzorius a sign of frumkeit? And to the miseducated who comment here so much, no, the government safety net is definitely not “over abundent”. It is in fact grossly inadequate.

gro§§e chochom
gro§§e chochom
2 years ago

decision does. not supersede state moratorium

hashomer
hashomer
2 years ago

Hppefully the landlord that owns the bldg where VIN is a tenant will evict you ‘ganoovim’.

TheDoctor
TheDoctor
2 years ago

Such an obvious ruling, of course the CDC doesn’t have such a power. Anyone who believes they do, is an ignorant moron.

D. Fault
D. Fault
2 years ago

In New York isn’t there also a State mandated eviction moratorium? How is that affected by this ruling?

Educated Archy
Educated Archy
2 years ago

Again all these comments and noone has showed me the math So Ill ask it again.

If you receive 1000 a week In PUA + lunch boxes+ Extra SNAP + 4 stimuls checks, why isn’t that enough to pay rent? Did yiu earn more than that before the pandemic?