Biden: 1st Black Woman Justice On High Court ‘Long Overdue’

26
President Joe Biden removes his face mask as he prepares to deliver remarks on the retirement of Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, left, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 27, 2022. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden on Thursday affirmed his pledge to nominate the first Black woman to the U.S. Supreme Court, saying it was “long overdue.” He praised retiring Justice Stephen Breyer as a model public servant and promised a nominee by the end of February.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Breyer joined Biden at the White House, a day after news broke of the 83-year-old’s upcoming retirement.

Since Biden took office in January 2021, he has focused on nominating a diverse group of judges to the federal bench, not just in race but also in professional expertise. He installed five Black women on federal appeals courts, with three more nominations pending before the Senate.

Biden has already met personally with at least one top nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson, 51, Breyer’s former clerk worked at the U.S. Sentencing Commission and has been a federal trial court judge since 2013 in the District of Columbia. The two met when Biden interviewed her for her current post as an appeals court judge in the D.C. circuit, where she has served since last June.

Early discussions about a successor are focusing on Brown Jackson, U.S. District Judge J. Michelle Childs and California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss White House deliberations. Jackson and Kruger have long been seen as possible nominees.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


26 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ari
Ari
2 years ago

Does a white male identifying as a black female qualify?

RACIST administration
RACIST administration
2 years ago

What a racist administration! Making skin color a qualifier for this job.

Triumpinwhitehouse
Triumpinwhitehouse
2 years ago

No other qualifications necessary

NYorker
NYorker
2 years ago

Maybe 1 of the looters in the department stores can qualify

S w
S w
2 years ago

Does she need a law degree? Does she need to have any other qualities? Last I checked, although many black women may be qualified , the color of ones skin and the gender is not the quality that makes a difference in the bench.

Ben
Ben
2 years ago

This administration is a joke Disgrace

stamnamefortrump
Noble Member
stamnamefortrump
2 years ago

Yes because everything is about race and not qualifications or right and wrong anymore

Judge by color
Judge by color
2 years ago

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character

Last edited 2 years ago by
Just Sayin'
Just Sayin'
2 years ago

Hmmm….
so…
Let’s see
So far We’ve got an African American a Latina , a Jewish woman.but no Asians.
Hey, what kind of discrimination is this? Why are Asians not represented?!?

grumpy
grumpy
2 years ago

Just make certain that this Black lady is also a trans so that every one will be liberally happy….

BTW, it might be good if she knows a bit about law, but it is not required….

Aviva Cohen
Aviva Cohen
2 years ago

Stupid
He should be looking for a blk female transgender
Then he will score big.
Sad

Sara
Sara
2 years ago

Kamala was chosen based on her skin color. Look how well that worked out for the country. She’s a disgrace and no doubt a SCOTUS nominee based solely on her skin color will probably be just as successful. This is discrimination against whites, Asians, Latinos, and people of every gender and color.
I think he should elect a gender less raceless, colorless, and probably brainless candidate.

Anonymous
Anonymous
2 years ago

It will be a disgrace to whomever is chosen that the decision was based solely on gender and skin clolor.

Shmuli
Shmuli
2 years ago

Biden’s spending too much time on this.

Just look for a candidate in Black’s Law Dictionary.

I was a Democrat until I saw the light
I was a Democrat until I saw the light
2 years ago

Just wondering the Supreme Court ruled that singling out one group
As only ones to chose from is discriminatory a violation of the constitution. Wonder what chucky the sho met would say if s done one said we only will interview white males or only a white Jewish female

Democrats are anti science morons.
Democrats are anti science morons.
2 years ago

What is a woman, see how the guy couldn’t even say she, instead used they because Democrats are morons who think people can change their gender, or can be non binary. Wacko freakazoids.