JERUSALEM (Israel Hayom) – Rabbi Benjamin Holtzman of Kibbutz Ma’ale Gilboa recently celebrated his first grandson Lavi’s circumcision ceremony with family and friends. However, the joyous event was somewhat overshadowed by an incident that occurred afterward online, causing Holtzman to reflect sadly on how countries, leaders, and organizations throughout history have treated one of the most important Jewish traditions.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
According to Holtzman, one of the attendees recorded the ceremony on their phone and uploaded it to YouTube to share with family members. However, access to the video was blocked.
“What bothered me most was the message on the website explaining the reason for blocking it,” Holtzman said. “It states that ‘content that endangers the emotional or physical health of minors cannot be published on YouTube’ – this reminded me of reasoning and excuses used throughout history to try to abolish Jewish customs – particularly the circumcision ceremony.”
Holtzman added that the person who uploaded the video appealed to YouTube about the block, but received a generic response, and the appeal was rejected.
Holtzman published a post on another social network (Facebook) describing the video block and added, “Even the Greeks and Romans banned circumcision under the pretext of bodily harm. Apparently, already Antiochus (167 BCE), and certainly Hadrian (117 CE) prohibited ‘castration and circumcision.’ And now YouTube is joining them.”
“An appeal was also submitted to YouTube, and unlike Antoninus Pius, the emperor who exempted Jews from the decree (but not other peoples, effectively preventing conversion) – YouTube rejected the appeal and maintained its ban on uploading circumcision ceremony videos,” he added. “I assume the initial removal was automatic, due to the video’s subject, not because someone complained about the content, but when it comes to appeals, they should dedicate more thought and thorough examination to it.”
“I think there needs to be more sensitivity to this issue, especially considering recent attempts in European countries to pass decisions against circumcision,” Holtzman said. “Sometimes they call it ‘harm to minors’ and sometimes ‘preserving bodily purity,’ but it joins a disturbing wave against Jewish traditions that have accompanied us for many generations, such as circumcision and kosher slaughter, for example.”
Eventually, Holtzman reported, the circumcision ceremony video was uploaded to another internet video sharing service, and the memento from the happy day was distributed among family members.
YouTube responded, “We reviewed the video and found it does not violate our Community Guidelines, as it was shared in an educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic context (EDSA). However, since the video includes nudity of minors, it is not suitable for all viewers and therefore has an age restriction.”
It should be noted that, according to the company’s child protection policy, content that includes nudity of minors cannot be uploaded to the platform. However, there may be very limited exceptions, but even in these cases, the content may be subject to age restrictions if it is not suitable for all viewing audiences.
This is silliness. Of course there shouldn’t be videos of a Bris online. It is a graphic bloody procedure performed on an area of the body that does not belong in public view. Comparing this to Antiochus or contemporary European countries banning Milah is outrageous and frankly counterproductive.
If we’re talking about videos that literally show a circumcision, I don’t see the problem with banning the video.
I’ve been to many Brisses where the Mohel announces “no pictures of the actual bris” Depending on what the vidio shows, it should be blockede.
This irresponsible klutz attendee wants to share it with family so he puts it on YouTube? Ever hear of WhatsApp?? That’s normally how families share information. Not for the whole world to see.
It is completely inappropriate to upload a personal video from a bris to YouTube or any other open format online video sharing service. End of story. Unwittingly, YouTube actually did this person, and frankly all yidden, a tremendous chesed by not allowing it. I am not at all condemning the character of the Rabbi. I assume that he is an otherwise good and holy person, we all have lapses in judgement at times, but to compare the YouTube decision not to allow the video with r”l the terrible and evil decrees of despotic regimes bent on destroying the Jewish people, is simply foolhardy and dangerous. It is on the level ridiculous Holocaust analogies that are misapplied to dissimilar current events.
Mazal Tov! Glad it was not put upom Youtube for all to see . . . Whatsapp it. Someone needs to use their seichel here and there obviously is much lacking here.
Is this what keeps Holtzman up at night?
You all don’t seem to get it. On YouTube you can watch any surgery from Brain to open heart.
This is an attack on Bris Milah