Op-Ed Why Republicans Should Thank Dr. O’Connor – a Bullet Dodged

39
Vice President Kamala Harris talks to reporters after presiding over a joint session of Congress to confirm the Electoral College votes at the Capitol, Monday, Jan. 6, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Dr. Kevin O’Connor’s refusal to testify before Congress has stirred outrage among conservatives. But beneath the frustration lies an uncomfortable truth: this man may have single-handedly spared the United States from an unprecedented national calamity. Whether he intended to or not, Dr. O’Connor saved the country from a leftist takeover—and conservatives should recognize the magnitude of that act.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


The Disaster We Almost Had

Let’s be blunt: had President Biden’s deteriorating health been publicly acknowledged and led to his removal, the United States would have faced a full-fledged constitutional crisis—one with Kamala Harris at the helm. Not for a month, not for a caretaker period, but potentially for a full term leading into the next election.

President Kamala Harris would have meant a radical lurch to the far-left fringe of American politics. Her ideology is not just liberal—it’s progressive to the point of destabilization. Sympathetic to anti-Israel demonstrators and unwilling to draw a hard line against groups expressing open support for Hamas, Harris has repeatedly aligned herself with the activist wing of the Democratic Party. Her social justice posturing, race-obsessed rhetoric, and deference to the most extreme voices in the culture wars make her a uniquely dangerous figure on the national stage.

Economically, her track record is just as alarming. She has backed disastrous redistributionist policies, green mandates that kill energy independence, and a welfare state vision that would have deepened inflation, discouraged work, and punished success. Add to that her evident lack of executive leadership and repeated failures to articulate coherent policy beyond buzzwords, and the picture becomes clear: a President Harris would have been a radical experiment at the worst possible time.

Dr. O’Connor’s Quiet Patriotism

Now, consider Dr. O’Connor. As the President’s physician, he stood at the intersection of medical ethics and national interest. Had he sounded the alarm—had he fed the calls for Biden to step down—he would have handed the White House to a woman whose far-left ideology had already been rejected by voters in the primaries.

Instead, he chose discretion. Continuity. And in doing so, he helped preserve the constitutional order and protect the country from absolute chaos. It was a moment of quiet but profound patriotism. Not the kind that earns headlines or public approval—but the kind that saves nations.

National Security, Global Implications

And the world was watching. Russia, China, Iran—all of them were looking for weakness, for internal disarray, for an opportunity to pounce. A Harris presidency, viewed globally as a soft-on-defense progressive without the backing of a popular mandate, would have broadcast vulnerability.

Dr. O’Connor’s choice kept the lights on and the engines running – not in the way we would have wanted per se, but it could have been far worse. It maintained deterrence abroad, stability at home, and continuity at a time when uncertainty could have sparked aggression or miscalculation. In a very real sense, Dr. O’Connor performed an act of national defense.

Play out the alternative: Biden is declared incapacitated. Kamala Harris assumes office. Her radical allies flood the airwaves and the streets. Markets plummet. Allies panic. Enemies test the waters. America spirals into uncertainty, all while being led by someone utterly out of her depth and ideologically opposed to the constitutional foundations she’s sworn to uphold.

That’s not a fever dream—it was a live possibility. Dr. O’Connor helped close that door.

The 2024 election delivered a clear mandate. President Trump is now executing a conservative agenda with broad support. That only became possible because the transition was delayed long enough for voters to decide the future—not for Kamala Harris to seize it by default.

Yes, transparency is important. But discretion, in moments like this, can be the highest form of service.

Republicans—and the country at large—should recognize what happened. Dr. O’Connor may never admit it. He may never seek praise. But history will remember him as the man who, by withholding a truth, protected a nation from a radical presidency it could not afford.

Kamala Harris was not just unprepared—she was the embodiment of a far-left ideological movement determined to remake America in its own image. That project was stalled, perhaps permanently, thanks to one man’s restraint.

We were saved from disaster. 

The views expressed by this op-ed writer do not necessarily reflect those of the VINNEWS Editorial board.

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group
39 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Reb Lou
Reb Lou
7 months ago

What I’m feeling is that Dr. O’Connor was unwittingly. directed by Hashem Yisborach.

the truth
the truth
7 months ago

What I’m seeing is an article written almost completely by AI.

We've got to keep the Congress in Republican hands
We've got to keep the Congress in Republican hands
7 months ago

I hear. Interesting. What the writer is saying makes sense.

zlate1
zlate1
7 months ago

The $64,000,000 question is did he do this wittingly or unwittingly.

If the former kudos and thanks. If the latter he set a dangerous precedent.

A president is elected by the people. Said people have the right to know if important decisions are made by the president or by autopen wielded by a cabal of political hacks.

Zumy
Zumy
7 months ago

I’m not sure that Dr O’Connor had all these profound and far-sighted goals when he didn’t sound the alarm about Pres.Biden. In hindsight, according to the writer, there is a tremendous amount to be grateful for. Perhaps O’Connor just didn’t see Harris as a candidate simply because stereotypically she didnt fit the bill and he opted to let the the term run its course and end there.

shmendrick
shmendrick
7 months ago

Not true at all. The Presidents’ mental health is the business of the people. Thus, it doesn’t matter at all which party the President is from. Especialy when we ll saw Biden being an issue, this guy has the chutzpah to plead the fifth, is not good for the well being of America. That’s all that matters.

Anonymous
Anonymous
7 months ago

This article is incorrect. While it’s true that not saying anything at the time when Biden was president, saved us from a Kamala Harris disaster, now he is able to come clean without causing any damage to the country

See
See
7 months ago

Nice though, but don’t think that was on O’caners mind he did it as a loyal lefty

Educated Archy
Educated Archy
7 months ago

I said this all along. We should be happy that Biden stayed in longer. It helped us win. Stop obsessing about Bidens mental state and just be happy. Move on

ah GROIS gelechter!
ah GROIS gelechter!
7 months ago

Sounds like Kamala Harris can be a good running mate for Communist Mamdani

ari
ari
7 months ago

we see who the BOSS who runs this world is

nosiree
nosiree
7 months ago

Plausible indeed that he didn’t want Kamala to take over.
Like salami, only G-d knows what’s inside …that sausage brain of his.

stop deleting posts
stop deleting posts
7 months ago

we got a disaster.