(JTA) – A sweeping new school choice subsidy and the first of its kind at the federal level is now law, after President Donald Trump signed his tax and spending package known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill” last week.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
The $1,700 federal tax credit to support private school tuition delivers a long-sought victory to Orthodox Jewish advocacy groups and other religious education proponents. The size of the tax credit is far less than what was initially included in the bill, but there is also no longer any cap on how many people can access it.
“The OBBB is big and complicated, but one thing is simple: the largest ever federal school choice program is now the law of the land,” Nathan Diament, executive director of the Orthodox Union Advocacy Center, said in a statement. “This has been an OU Advocacy goal for decades.”
The subsidy embedded within the sprawling, nearly 900-page legislation is called Educational Choice for Children Act, and it could generate hundreds of millions of dollars in private school scholarships annually, starting in 2027.
The program offers taxpayers a 100% federal tax credit for donations of up to $1,700 “scholarship-granting organizations” — entities set up to distribute the donations. Those groups, in turn, will disburse funds to help families pay for tuition at private and faith-based schools, including Jewish day schools and yeshivas.
While donors cannot specify that their contribution support a particular student or family, they may be permitted to direct funds toward a specific school or network of schools — a feature that could prove especially beneficial for religious communities seeking to bolster their educational institutions. And while the legislation specifies that scholarship-granting organizations must give to at least 10 students across at least two schools, it does not limit how many an individual student can receive.
Orthodox groups, including the Orthodox Union and its Teach Coalition as well as Agudath Israel of America, were among the most vocal backers of the school choice provision, which they say will reshape how religious schools are funded and increase access to Jewish education.
In a statement, Rabbi A.D. Motzen of Agudath Israel thanked key Republican lawmakers for championing the policy and called it “an important step closer to a vision of universal school choice in all 50 states.”
The law does not mandate participation. States will need to elect whether to implement the program, which opens up a new frontier for advocacy.
“The fight doesn’t end with the signing of the bill. States must opt into the program, and we are positioned to lead that effort,” Sydney Altfield, Teach Coalition’s national director said in a statement.
While details will be finalized by federal officials, the potential financial impact on Jewish day schools and the families enrolled in them could be substantial. Paul Bernstein, CEO of the Jewish day school support network Prizmah, said the average scholarship award is expected to be “quite meaningful,” calling the news a historic opportunity.
“We believe that many Jewish day schools across the country will eventually cover a majority of their scholarship needs through the program,” Bernstein said in a statement. “We view this program as a major catalyst for Jewish day school affordability.”
The school choice measure marks a significant shift in federal education policy. Although more than two dozen states already have their own voucher or tax-credit programs, this is the first time the federal government is offering tax incentives on a national scale to support private education.
Critics of the law, including public education advocates, have warned that such programs risk diverting support from public schools and eroding the separation of church and state. But its supporters argue it empowers families, especially those seeking religious education for their children, to make choices they couldn’t otherwise afford.

What windfall? Do I believe for a minute that my tuition will go down? Absolutely not!!! All I believe now is that the schools will work together to create the scholarship fund and then require a donation from the parents to the fund in addition to regular tuition with the claim that it is a 1:1 tax credit, so donating the money does not cost you anything.
This bill does nothing to help aliviate the tuition burden. $1700 is nothing, and that’s only if you qualify for it. Your household income can’t be over 3 times the median income.
Once again the middle class loses
Sounds convoluted. Why can’t parents simply get a tax credit for tuition paid ? Instead of having to donate to a SGO.
So now Billions of tax money will fund spreading of thousands of new moslems and catholics schools??
Not sure that’s a price worth paying in exchange for the comparatively tiny amounts going toward yeshivos
Why shouldn’t we have a say on our local property taxes to which entity it should go, I understand the hole in the boat argument, that your neighbors public schools should be funded so the whole city has normalcy, (not going into the public school system dialogue) but at least part should go towards where the parent send their kids, as this would also be a incentive for parents sending their kids to better schools. We spend thousands for school tax but we get almost nothing back.
I actually pay more in property taxes than what I actually pay for my 4 kids in private school.
Why shouldn’t I have at least a few grand of my taxes go to my kids school?
There is no windfall here for the parents. One can only donate max $1,700 and get a full credit for that amount
But each state must opt in – tough job to get NYS to do so
The larger mosdos will do well (e.g. all the chassidishe ones and larger ones) as their people will give to them
The smaller and local yeshiva and Bais Yaakovs will have a tougher time getting a large enough oilam to make it anything substantial
But whatever it is, it is a lot better than nothing and should help all the mosdos – but not necessarily the parents
Did the editorial board of the NY Times agree to this stipulation?
Its a Non-refundable tax-credit meaning you will only get the credit if you have a tax liability
every thing every one is saying is true true and true but unrelated. Every community taxpayer should give max donation to the fund instead of paying the govt (that’s a credit) you are designating the $$ you donate go to schools and not food stamps, roads, military. Not one grandparent or uncle or friend has any control if it will benefit the schools of their choice but it’s not costing them anything to give.
Unrelated- that money will go to scholarships which you may or may not get
Unrelated- schools may or may not reduce tuition a penny.
Unrelated- anyone on scholarship now may get more or less, because the school is no longer controlling who gets what reduction in tuition.
NOT true- askanim dont know any better because the law passed but federal rules havent been established about who actually gets what.
What they’re not telling you is that included in the bill that was passed was a last minute Senate “compromise” that requires each State to opt in to this for it to apply in that State. Which means that this will not benefit people living in true blue States (California. Michigan, go down the line…)
I think most people getting a tuition break are already getting more than $1,700 off, and it costs a LOT more than that to educate 1 student, even in public school! Private school is closer to 10x that. A tax credit would be good for that amount, but we already pay so much more.
Trump did it despite aguda opposing home