The Biggest Change to Voting in Republican Election Bill Could Become a Burden for Many US Voters

    27
    Customers stand in line to get birth and death certificates at the Columbus Public Health Department in Columbus, Ohio, on Tuesday, March, 10, 2026. (AP Photo/Julie Carr Smyth)

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Joshua Bogdan was born and raised in the United States. The only time the New Hampshire resident has left the country was for a day and a half in seventh grade, when he went to Canada to see Niagara Falls.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Even so, that did not mean proving his U.S. citizenship in last fall’s local elections was easy.

    The 31-year-old arrived at his voting place in Portsmouth and handed the poll worker his driver’s license, just as he had done in other towns when arriving to vote. She said that would no longer do.

    The poll worker said that under the state’s new proof-of-citizenship law, which took effect for the first time during town elections in 2025, Bogdan would need a passport or his birth certificate because he had moved and needed to reregister at his new address. A scramble ensued, turning the voting process that he had always found fun and invigorating into a nerve-wracking game of beat the clock.

    “I didn’t know that anything had officially changed walking in there,” he said. “And then being told that I had to provide a passport that I’ve never had or a birth certificate that’s usually tucked away somewhere safe just to cast my vote — which I’ve done before — it was frustrating.”

    A national push, despite noncitizen voting being rare
    Bogdan’s experience in New Hampshire is a glimpse into the future for potentially millions of voters across the country. That is if Republican voting legislation being pushed aggressively by President Donald Trump passes Congress and a “show your papers” law is put in place in time for the November elections.

    The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility, or SAVE America Act, cleared the U.S. House last month on a mostly party-line basis. Republicans say it would improve election integrity. Trump has called its safeguards common sense. The bill is scheduled to come up in the U.S. Senate next week for voting and debate.

    Republican messaging has mostly highlighted a less divisive provision in the bill that would require voters to show a photo ID, but the mandate for people to provide documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections is likely to have the most wide-ranging consequences. Noncitizens already are prohibited from voting in federal elections, and it is not allowed by any state. Cases where it occurs are rare.

    Obtaining the necessary documents under the SAVE Act is not as easy as it might sound. A similar effort was tried in Kansas a decade ago and turned into a debacle that eventually was blocked by the courts after more than 30,000 eligible citizens were prevented from registering.

    A long list of documents to use, but with caveats
    Rebekah Caruthers, president and CEO at the Fair Elections Center, said the legislation’s strict documentation requirements could move the U.S. “in the opposite direction” of representative democracy.

    “If this bill passes, it would deny millions of eligible Americans their fundamental freedom to vote,” she said in an email. “This includes millions of people who make up your communities, including married women, people of color and voters who live in rural areas.”

    The list of qualifying documents in the SAVE Act for proving citizenship appears long, but many of them come with qualifiers.

    Under the bill, a REAL ID -compliant driver’s license would have to indicate that “the applicant is a citizen,” but not all do. Only five states — Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Vermont and Washington — offer the type of enhanced REAL IDs that explicitly indicate U.S. citizenship.

    Standard driver’s licenses, generally available to both citizens and noncitizens, often do not include a citizenship indicator. Some states, including Ohio, have recently added them.

    The stipulations continue, buried in the fine print.

    While military ID cards are listed as qualifying documents under the act, they will not suffice on their own. The bill says a military ID must be accompanied by a military “record of service” that indicates the person’s birthplace was in the U.S.

    A DD214, the current standard-issue certificate of release or discharge for all military service branches, does not currently fulfill that requirement. According to the Pentagon, that document only lists where someone lived at points of entry and discharge and a person’s current home of record. It does not list where someone was born.

    Obtaining a passport requires time and money
    For most provisions, the SAVE Act contains no phase-in period that would give voters and local election offices time to adjust. If passed by Congress and signed by Trump, its documentary proof-of-citizenship mandate would apply immediately, meaning it would be in place for this year’s midterm elections.

    That could lead to a rush to obtain documents by those who want to register or need to reregister. A 2025 University of Maryland study estimates that 21.3 million Americans who are eligible to vote do not have or have easy access to documents to prove their citizenship, including nearly 10% of Democrats, 7% of Republicans and 14% of people unaffiliated with either major party.

    A passport would most effectively meet the requirement, but only about half of American adults have one, according to the State Department, and the SAVE Act requires the passport to be current. An expired one does not count.

    Obtaining a passport in time for a looming voter registration deadline is another potential hurdle.

    Workers who process passports had layoffs at the State Department reversed, but just last month the department forbid passport processing at certain public libraries that had long helped relieve pressure at the department. Government libraries, post offices, county clerks and others still provide the service.

    It takes four weeks to six weeks to get a passport, according to the department’s website, excluding mailing time. A new passport costs $165 for adults while renewals cost $130, and the photo costs $10 or $20 more. The turnaround time can be sped up to two weeks or three weeks for an additional $60 — and for even faster processing, add $22 more. The fully expedited process for a new passport would cost at least $257.

    Birth and marriage certificates
    A birth certificate may be a quicker and cheaper choice for most people, but there are twists.

    The SAVE Act requires a certified birth certificate issued by a state, local government or tribal government. What does not appear to qualify is the certificate signed by the doctor that many new parents are given in the hospital when their child is born. It provides information similar to a certified birth certificate, but would not meet the letter of the federal legislation.

    Like passports, birth certificates can sometimes take weeks to obtain. Those who live near their birthplaces can visit the local vital statistics office, but staffing shortages and escalating demand for REAL IDs have caused significant backlogs in some states. In New York, the waiting period for certified copies is four months, the state said. Average processing times for online certificate requests vary widely by state, from as few as three days to 12 weeks or longer.

    People whose birth certificates don’t match their current IDs — mostly women who changed their names when they married — would likely need additional documentation to register to vote under the bill. A 2023 Pew Research Center survey found about 80% of women in opposite-sex marriages in the U.S. take their husband’s last name.

    A major change to the voting process, but with no extra money
    Notably, the SAVE Act does not provide any money to help states and local governments implement the changes or promote them to voters.

    For Bogdan, that was part of the problem when New Hampshire’s proof-of-citizenship law took effect. People who have voted elsewhere in the state are not required to show proof of citizenship in their new towns if poll workers confirm their registration history, but Bogdan said workers at his polling place did not seem to know that or try to look up the information.

    He eventually was able to cast his ballot because, by luck, he had recently retrieved his birth certificate from his parents’ house more than an hour away so he could apply for a REAL ID. But he said government notices to voters would help prevent possible disenfranchisement.

    “Young voters like myself don’t always carry around our birth certificate, Social Security card, all that important stuff, because it’s not used ever or very often,” he said. “And so all those young kids who are going to go out and try and vote will be held back from that.”

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    27 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Liepa
    Liepa
    4 days ago

    A necessary evil, thanks to the Demcrats welcoming illegal aliens into the country and allowing them to vote illegally.

    Wilbur
    Wilbur
    4 days ago

    Thank you Democrats for making this necessary.

    G-d have mercy on us..
    G-d have mercy on us..
    4 days ago

    This problem is only in America. Every developed country their citizens have a citizenship IDcard or a passport.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    4 days ago

    I suppose he protested when the DMV asked for his birth certificate. I suppose he protested when registering for school they asked for his birth certificate. Literally the inmates have overrun the asylum.

    Let’s go
    Let’s go
    4 days ago

    Fake fake fake news.

    First of all, none of this would be necessary if millions of illegals hadn’t poured into the country, and then voted in our elections. You’re ticked off because you to prove you’re a citizen? Blame your local democrat.

    Second, many places haven’t required even a drivers license to vote (Maryland). Ridiculous

    And who doesn’t have a real id license? It’s been many years since it was first rolled out? Can’t get on a plane without one.

    Don’t want legitimate elections or not? Simple

    American
    American
    4 days ago

    The states should have put on non citizens ids that they they aren’t citizens, and illegals shouldn’t get id to begin with, this is need to fix that.

    Esther in LA
    Esther in LA
    4 days ago

    OK AP , we get it. You like when non citizens can vote.

    Democrats are the Hamas Nazi Supporter Party.
    Democrats are the Hamas Nazi Supporter Party.
    4 days ago

    Poor little Bogdan.

    marc h.
    marc h.
    1 day ago

    It is OK, we don’t want illegal aliens voting, that is what the D’s want

    My Take
    My Take
    4 days ago

    It sounds like it would be harder to vote than to obtain a driver’s license. It could backfire by causing people not to vote because of the hhassle.

    Common sense
    Common sense
    4 days ago

    I came to pick up my own baby this Thursday in NYU in Manhattan I had a wrist on my hand I also had yesterdays Phot ID and pass but I did not have my ID with me as I left it at home and I had to wait 10 minutes for someone to email a copy of my license (ID) In order to get my vistior pass. so common sense says if you can not get in to an hospital with out Photo ID you need Photo Id to vote.

    Educated Archy
    Educated Archy
    4 days ago

    Our whole voting system is so old fashioned. Let me start by saying if you pay taxes and have an SS that should be enough. why not just link to the govt website and see your info. Then one can get some kind of verification from there. We should also be able to vote online. When we pay taxes , we should get a number that you type in when you vote and then just vote online. Its that simple.

    Now I see why it makes sense to require ID. But lets just be real, at the end of the day there was no major fraud and never was. By default, its not worth it and would be impossible to commit large scale fraud anyhow. The concerns are nonsensne.

    Response
    Response
    4 days ago

    It seems that a significant number of married or once married women will need to get additional documentation to vote if they don’t already have passports or Real ID drivers licenses. I wonder what party married women tend to vote for? Especially the ones who don’t have passports or real IDs.

    HepechDaasBaalHabatim
    HepechDaasBaalHabatim
    4 days ago

    Wow,wheres this article from,MSNOW?