JERUSALEM (VINnews) — A public marriage proposal in which a man kneels and presents a ring to his intended bride in front of friends and family could, under certain circumstances, raise a serious halachic issue, according to Rabbi Avraham Deri, the chief rabbi of Beersheba.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Rabbi Deri warned that when a proposal is conducted in a manner that meets certain requirements of Jewish law and takes place in the presence of witnesses, there could be a concern that the exchange of the ring constituted a halachic marriage, or kiddushin. The issue could become particularly significant if the couple later decides not to marry.
“Marriage proposals conducted in a format in which the prospective groom proposes with a ring in the presence of friends and relatives, if the groom later decides to withdraw the proposal, could lead to a situation in which the couple would require a religious divorce,” Rabbi Deri said.
His comments were made during a study day organized by the Marriage, Kashrut and Rabbinate Division of Israel’s Ministry of Religious Services for marriage registrars from the Southern District.
The ministry stressed that this does not mean that every marriage proposal involving a ring constitutes a marriage under Jewish law. Rather, the question depends on the specific circumstances of each case and whether the necessary halachic conditions were met.

Among the factors that may be examined are the exact wording used during the proposal, the manner in which the ring was presented and accepted, the presence and status of witnesses, and other circumstances surrounding the event. Officials said that if there is any doubt regarding a proposal conducted in such a manner, the couple should consult a rabbi or authorized marriage registrar.
The study day was held at the Beersheba Religious Council, headed by Rabbi Ofer Kardi. Rabbis, marriage registrars and representatives of religious councils from across southern Israel took part in the event, which focused on halachic issues relevant to their work as well as technological changes being introduced into Israel’s marriage-registration system.
A major part of the technological session focused on “Shirat Hayam,” a new national digital platform for managing the marriage-registration process.
During the event, marriage registrars were introduced to the new system, including tools for opening and managing marriage files online, verifying documents against national databases and synchronizing information with the Chief Rabbinate’s systems. The platform also includes computerized documentation of procedures for verifying Jewish identity and marital status, as well as the issuance of secure digital certificates.
Rabbi Hizkiyahu Samin, director of the Ministry of Religious Services’ Marriage and Rabbinate Division, said the initiative is intended to combine halachic expertise with improved public services. “The innovative series of study days reflects our commitment to continuously improving the service provided to citizens,” Samin said. “The combination of deep halachic knowledge with advanced technological tools is an inseparable part of the process we are leading.”
He added that discussions held in roundtable sessions allow officials to engage in open dialogue and develop solutions suited to changing needs in the field, while also introducing advanced technological tools into Israel’s marriage-registration system.

Cuz there’s going to be idiots saying that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. But this is so so so true. It has nothing to do with the kneeling. It has to do with giving her the ring and saying “will you marry me.” Because that makes the marriage contingent on the ring. It’s bad enough.
Besides, where did this goyishe shtussim of kneeling come in anyway? WE ARE YIDDIN. WE DON’T KNEEL TO ANYONE!
Long overdue. Especially in cases where the couple is living together RL
VERY TRUE. TEENAGERS AT LARGE YOUTH GROUP EVENTS have been known to need a divorce when reciting the magic words with two kosher witnesses and ring or other object of vale,
usally there is at least one person (an aid talking the picture)
There is no daas for Kidushin. We would require אנן סהדי. Didn’t Reb Moshe pasken it isn’t Kidushin. Wasn’t this machlokes with Rav Henkin? I’m asking if someone knows if this is correct?