Washington – Five former U.S. ambassadors to Israel said Wednesday that the man President Donald Trump has selected for the post is unqualified and are urging senators to carefully consider his nomination.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
In a letter sent to members of the Foreign Relations Committee, the former diplomats said David Friedman has staked out “extreme, radical positions” and has derided the two-state solution as an “illusory” fix for a non-existent problem.
“We believe the committee should satisfy itself that Mr. Friedman has the balance and the temperament required to represent the United States as ambassador to Israel,” they wrote.
The committee is scheduled to meet Thursday for Friedman’s confirmation hearing.
Trump, during a White House news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was evasive about endorsing a two-state solution with the Palestinians. That would create an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel and has been the international community’s preferred solution for nearly two decades.
The ambassadors, who served Republican and Democratic presidents, say Friedman accused President Barack Obama and the entire State Department of anti-Semitism. They say he’s also characterized supporters of J Street, a liberal Jewish group, as “kapos,” the Jews who cooperated with Nazis during the Holocaust.
The son of an Orthodox rabbi, Friedman is a fervent supporter of Israeli settlements, an opponent of Palestinian statehood and staunch defender of Israel’s government.
“The American ambassador must be dedicated to advancing our country’s longstanding bipartisan goals in the region: strengthening the security of the United States and our ally Israel, and advancing the prospects for peace between Israel and its neighbors, in particular the Palestinians,” the former ambassadors wrote. “If Israel is to carry on as a democratic, Jewish nation, respected internationally, we see no alternative to a two-state solution.”
The letter opposing Friedman’s nomination was signed by Thomas Pickering, William Harrop, Edward Walker, Daniel Kurtzer and James Cunningham.
And how many didn’t sign?
Quite a group. Not exactly singers of Hatikvah.
I support Friedman.
Just what makes him unqualified? The entire list given are all political opinions. So are they claiming he is unqualified because they don’t like his political opinions? I suppose that is consistent – Obama when he was senator blocked the nomination of court appointees based (by his own admission) for nothing more than he did not like their political choices. That included blocking a female African American who came from a background of poverty and who lifted herself up by her bootstraps to graduate from law school and lead a distinguished career in lower courts from being promoted to the higher courts. His only reason for blocking her is because of the years she moved from Democrat to Republican.
Duh? A no brainer!
Political posturing on their part. The ambassador takes direction from POTUS .