Mahwah, NJ – New Jersey Town Orders To Remove Pipes Showing Boundary For ‘Eruv’

    18

    White PVC piping that serves as part of the Eruv, is seen fixed to a utility pole in Mahwah NJ on JUly 25, 2017 (Sandy  EllerVINnews.com)Mahwah, NJ – A town in New Jersey has ordered an Orthodox Jewish organization to take down its eruv, or religious boundary, by early next month.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Mahwah, which is located across the New York state border, told the South Monsey Eruv Fund to remove the white plastic piping from utility poles that it uses for the symbolically enclosed area by Aug. 4. An eruv allows observant Jews to carry objects and push strollers outside of their homes on Shabbat.

    The Orthodox community told The Associated Press that it had been given permission to hang the piping by the utility company. But town officials said the piping is banned because it is considered signage.

    More than 1,200 people have signed an online petition calling for the eruv to be taken down. Many of the dozens of comments accompanying the petition, titled “Protect the Quality of our Community in Mahwah,” refer to “these people” and express concerns about falling property values. Most of them are anonymous.

    “I don’t want these rude, nasty, dirty people who think they can do what they want in our nice town,” one of the comments reads.

    Another says: “I do not want the town of Mahwah to turn into an undesirable place to live. These people do not assimilate with other people outside their community. I do not want them controlling our school board and siphoning funds for their yeshivas. Also, they buy houses which they claim is for religious purposes and do not pay taxes. They should stay where they are and leave our town alone.”


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    18 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    yonasonw
    Member
    yonasonw
    6 years ago

    “…controlling our school board and siphoning funds for their yeshivas…buy houses which they claim is for religious purposes and do not pay taxes…”

    Sadly, this is not inaccurate reflection of events in Spring Valley and Lakewood.

    As was said in another frum forum…we are our worst enemy, giving plenty of ammunition to the anti-Semites.

    radrad
    radrad
    6 years ago

    Sounds like the America my grandparents encountered.
    Time for the Agudah to show them some LOVE

    Taxbucky
    Taxbucky
    6 years ago

    I don’t understand
    Is it the piping or the eruv they want to get rid of?

    Normal
    Normal
    6 years ago

    Wow, stupidity. You draw a map, put it on an app, and email it out and people will know where they can carry. We should be thankful they let us put up the Eruv and not test their patience.

    6 years ago

    Seems like a bit of anti-Semitism going on here. Property values would probably rise. Of course, with rising property values go rising assessments – and higher property taxes. A bet that when the matter is appealed the poles will not be deemed to be signage – but it is just another example of the downside of our refusal to assimilate.

    ercsd
    ercsd
    6 years ago

    I doubt that there are too many observant Jews in Mahwah. In which case there is no need for this. South Monsey isn’t even close to Mahwah. It’s on the Montvale border. They are coming across as bullies. It’s like “watch out here we come”.

    shtusim100
    shtusim100
    6 years ago

    There is plenty of legal precedent for the establishment of an Eiruv. This has been litigated in court and the Eiruv won. Its just a matter of time until it works its way through.

    6 years ago

    In many cases, it is secular Jews who are against the Eruv; there was such a case in the Hamptons, a few years ago. Also, in University Heights, near Cleveland, Ohio, the secular Jews were against an area being developed for several frum Shuls, as well as a Chabad.