Culver City, CA – U.S. Auto Regulator Probing Tesla ‘Autopilot’ Crash

    1

    This Monday, Jan. 22, 2018 still frame from video provided by KCBS-TV shows a Tesla Model S electric car that has crashed into a fire engine on Interstate 405 in Culver City, Calif. APCulver City, CA – The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said on Thursday it was sending investigators to examine the crash of a Tesla Inc <TSLA.O> vehicle, apparently traveling in semi-autonomous mode, and a fire truck in California.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The move follows an announcement on Tuesday by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) that it was sending two investigators to the scene to examine both driver and vehicle factors in Monday’s accident in which the driver said the vehicle was operating in “Autopilot” mode.

    Tesla declined to comment on the new probe. NHTSA said in a statement it was sending a special team to “investigate the crash and assess lessons learned.”

    The government probes escalate the risk for Tesla and automakers at a time when the industry is seeking federal legislation that would ease deployment of self driving cars.

    The NTSB can make safety recommendations but only the NHTSA can order automakers to recall unsafe vehicles or fine automakers if they fail to remedy safety defects in a timely fashion. Before the agency could demand a recall from Tesla, it must open a formal investigation, a step it has not yet taken.

    The NTSB probe is the safety board’s second into a Tesla crash that may be linked to Autopilot, the automaker’ s semi-autonomous driver assist system that handles some tasks and allows drivers under certain conditions to take their hands off the wheel for extended periods.
    This Monday, Jan. 22, 2018 still frame from video provided by KCBS-TV shows a Tesla Model S electric car that has crashed into a fire engine on Interstate 405 in Culver City, Calif.  AP
    Tesla requires users to agree to keep their hands on the wheel “at all times” before they can use Autopilot.

    The Culver City, California fire department tweeted on Monday that an engine was struck by a Tesla “traveling at 65 mph. The driver reports the vehicle was on Autopilot. Amazingly there were no injuries.”

    The NTSB faulted Tesla in a prior fatal Autopilot crash.

    In September, NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt said operational limitations in the Tesla Model S played a major role in a May 2016 crash that killed a driver using the vehicle’s semi-autonomous system.

    The first fatality in a Tesla vehicle operating in Autopilot mode raised questions about the safety of systems that can perform driving tasks for long stretches with little or no human intervention, but which cannot completely replace human drivers.

    In January 2017, an NHTSA probe of the fatal Autopilot crash found no evidence of defects.

    Tesla shares closed down 2 percent at $345.89.

    Tesla in September 2016 unveiled improvements to Autopilot, adding new limits on hands-off driving.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    1 Comment
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    blubluh
    blubluh
    6 years ago

    In my view, the rush to deploy so-called self-driving vehicles is troubling. I’ve seen some, but not much much in the way of public legislative hearings with manufacturers to disclose risks and limitations of these vehicles in exchange for easing regulations to allow them on public roads.

    Even simple issues like how well such vehicles deal with street flooding, icy roads, animals or children darting out unexpectedly, etc. are unknown to me, though I pay attention to such reports as they appear in the media.

    Yes manufacturers need to test in real world conditions, but such tests should be strictly monitored and controlled until the technology proves better able to protect people and property than when under human control.