New York – NY Times Trying To Make Up With Orthodox Jews?

    39

    New York – From the earliest days of Nazi Germany through the present time, the New York Times has been continuously assailed in books by prominent scholars such as Prof. Laurel Leff, articles by respected politicians such as Ed Koch, watchdog organizations such as CAMERA, huge numbers of pundits and columnists such as Mark Silverberg, and editorials in high-circulation newspapers and magazines such as the New York Post and Commentary, for its long-term and blatant antipathy to Jewish causes — and, most particularly, its biased and unfavorable “news” coverage of matters relating to the State of Israel.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Despite this long history, it appears that the Gray Lady has lately taken to running articles that might be construed as designed to salve the feeling of the Jewish — particularly Orthodox and Chasidic — communities, among whom there may well have been a precipitous decline in support and circulation, at least, judging by the anecdotal evidence I see by comments in the Jewish Forum and from my personal friends and acquaintances.

    Just lately, Times readers have been treated to a series of peculiarly Jewish-oriented articles, including the whimsical, the contorted, and the historical/nostalgic.

    On April 9 last, the Times ran a major feature highlighting “Seder Fare for Pets That Keep Kosher,” which was illustrated by a photo of a dog with yarmulke chomping up Passover food on a Seder table, and explained that,

    Ms. Lerman, who grew up in an Orthodox home and keeps kosher still, does a brisk business in quadruped Judaica in her store. She sells yarmulkes and tallits (prayer shawls) for dogs as well as plush toys by a company called Chewish Pets, including a bagel and a fish embroidered with the word “lox.” The store supplies such items, and Evanger’s food, to increasingly popular Bark Mitzvahs, a cheeky canine rite of passage where, as documented in videos of the celebrations posted on YouTube, some guests utter a congratulatory “Muzzle Tov.”

    This past week, readers discovered an article, although poorly written and confusingly narrated, about a supplier of the ubiquitous “black hats” to Brooklyn’s Chasidic communities. Even included were the famous Italian Borsalino toppers — of which my own non-religious fashion example (a gift from my wife) might be included.

    And today (Monday, May 11), Times reporter Dan Bilefsky recounts the story of the Prague Golem:

    They say the Golem, a Jewish giant with glowing eyes and supernatural powers, is lurking once again in the attic of the Old-New Synagogue here.

    Small stones left by visitors at the tombstone of its supposed maker, Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel.

    The Golem, according to Czech legend, was fashioned from clay and brought to life by a rabbi to protect Prague’s 16th-century ghetto from persecution, and is said to be called forth in times of crisis.

    Bilefsky, however, doesn’t fail to mention that,

    Even the first lady, Michelle Obama, paid her respects, when she visited Rabbi Loew’s grave last month and, following Jewish tradition, placed a prayer on a piece of paper and put it near his tombstone.

    After so many articles which have tended to alienate observant Jews, from the slightly mocking tone of reports on the possibility of hair imported for wigmaking from India being non-kosher due to a chance that it was related to idol worship, to a discussion of concern about microscopic crustaceans in New York drinking water, to a continuing anti-Israel bias in Middle East reporting, could it be that the marketing gurus at the Times have decided to make up for past sins by publishing material that places Jews and Jewish practices in a more favorable light?

    Your guess is as good as mine; but if that is the intention, Pinch and his minions have a very long way to go to mitigate the damage they gave been doing for so many years among observant Jews and pro-Zionists among their readership.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    39 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Monsey Man
    Monsey Man
    14 years ago

    Next move….a joint project with the Forward in Yiddish. THEY LOST!!!!!!

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    Now that they are nearly bankrupt, they want to make nice to yiddin…..I’m kvelling…

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    I still won’t read the lady in gray rags

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    This is just a bunch of baloney. The New York Times has been publishing articles about orthodox Jews for as long as I can remember. Some put us in a good light and some didn’t.( Let’s face it. It’s not too easy to understand why we couldn’t wear sheitlach from India!), There’s absolutely nothing new going on here. Just someone looking for something to write about on a, B”H, now news day.

    Disgusted with the NY Times
    Disgusted with the NY Times
    14 years ago

    It will not help them they are in a death spiral. Amen

    Eli
    Eli
    14 years ago

    Too little, too late, let the New York Slims go down down down

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    go out of money! and like my friend would say down with england and up with the drudge report

    Askupeh
    Askupeh
    14 years ago

    I remember that the NYT had a front page picture where the caption said that four Israeli soldiers are looking to rape a Palestinian woman. I called them as many did and they only had a correction where nobody really looks. They always portrayed Israel as the bad guy and the Arabs as the good guy. I remember well their coverage of 911. They barely mentioned on page 16 or so that the Arabs were dancing on the Streets of New York. Even in that small article they did a spin to spare the Arabs any shame. Good riddance, Vekein Yoivdu.

    Viduy
    Viduy
    14 years ago

    The Old Lady is (financially) on her death bed.
    She is saying Viduy.
    The harm she did to Yidden over decades will not easily be undone.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    Did you read the articles that are supposed to placate the orthodox community? I did. They were condenscending, not flattering. Even the one with the hats was stupid and trivial, making orthodox jews look like they have nothing to do all day. The NYT can rot in gehenim along with those that publish it.

    Dave G
    Dave G
    14 years ago

    It appears that the NY Times is more comforatble with it’s portrayal of Jews that are maintained in their “traditional” non threataning place, so to speak, as opossed to Jews/Israeli’s that dare to assert themselves and go against the preceived status quo.

    Fish monger
    Fish monger
    14 years ago

    I don’t know what I will use for fish wrap when they go under, any suggestions?

    chief doofis
    chief doofis
    14 years ago

    A few years ago, the Times carried a photo of a young man who had been badly beaten. He was getting “shoved” in to an Israel police vehicle. The Slimes captioned the story as a Palestinian youth being beaten by Israeli police. In reality, the boy was a Yeshiva student from the Midwest. He was being trundled in to the police car, to ESCAPE from a Palestinian mob. Of course the Slimes issued a retraction. Somewhere between the obituaries and the car ads!

    No More Kesef
    No More Kesef
    14 years ago

    What a joke. The NYT is broke and broken. They write about “Jewish” Dogs and think that is news? It’s an insult. Let them sell their stock to Mr. Slim of Mexico. Then at least the sports section might be improved. It is time for the Sulzberger family to go out and get jobs and see how the “people” have to work and make a living in this great world. Maybe in their spare time they can enjoy reading the NY Post !!!

    A.
    A.
    14 years ago

    A lot of newspapers will soon be going out of business (some already have) due to online and electronic news sources. While I enjoy reading from actual paper, I will definitely not miss the NYT. Goodbye, farewell, and we will not miss you.

    Shlomo
    Shlomo
    14 years ago

    The Times is only a symptom of an underlying problem: assimilated Jews in a positions of power and who are (1) scared, (2) embarrassed, and (3) resentful of their brethren who are (1) proud, (2) proud, and (3) proud of their heritage.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    The NY Slimes is oozing its way to insolvency and to oblivion — where it belongs. The left-wing Jew-hating Sulzbergers have been bent on erasing any vestiges of their previous Jewishness and have thereby succeded in erasing the NY Slimes.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    I wonder what I will use on my floor next year before Pesach when I have to do my refrigerator and stove!!

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    The end of the NYT could not come soon enough!

    “Ki Korov Yom Eidum”

    Rippin Pinchas
    Rippin Pinchas
    14 years ago

    “articles by respected politicians such as Ed Koch”

    Respected? Huh? This was the first thing that threw me off.

    I remember back in the 80’s when they did a story on the Schlessinger murder. The NY Slimes claimed a female arab murdered himbecuase Schlessinger, a yeshiva bochur, tried to rape her. As it turned out, they got the story wrong. They never made a correction or apoligized to his family about the baloney kick-em-while-their-down story. Nor did they ever make any attempt to investigate. And then the Slimes had resources to make the investigation.

    Now that they have hit hard times, they are trying to make nice.If they change, we will accept it. However, their history will make us skeptical, as well as the timing. If they want, they can hire the “respected” Ed Koch and have him write articles for them.

    In addition, the last I heard they were still employing Thomas Friedman. Memo to Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., if you want us to consider your gestures, get rid of Friedman.

    Ahem
    Ahem
    14 years ago

    If there was ever an advertising pitch, this is it. They are BEGGING the jews to buy their papers now.

    No thank you.

    Avrohom Abba
    Avrohom Abba
    14 years ago

    Why did they ignore so many thousands of complaints and cancelled subscriptions all these years since they used to be a good newspaper twenty or thirty years ago. Why? Is it because they are losing a lot of advertising? I just don’t understand why they ran so many articles in favor of the haters. Large pictures covering a qwuarter of a page showing so many pictures, so many times depicting poor, innocent, downtrodden, wounded and dead “Palestinians.” Yet so few, so very few showing the dead Israelis, the dead from suicide bombers and the refusal to use the word “terrorists.” Why did they try to imitate the BBC?
    Guess what? It also bothered me why they were so against the United States!
    So many, many stories on the front page about Abu Graive and only two about the American contractors who were dragged naked and tortured and hung on a bridge in Iraq! It was like reading a foreign newspaper.
    Now, they are trying to be positive to the Jewish population? Huh?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    The NYT is losing everything they have, they even sold their building and are leasing back a portion of it, their ad revenue is in the toilet, and their readership is not where they would want it.

    They are known as Anti Israel, and Anti Jewish, and they get what they deserve.
    They are trying to write about chasidic and chabad, and other orthodox, because people are fascinated by it. the Wall Street Journal is kicking their BU*T, don’t confuse the ME TOO, with the fact that they hate you and wished you never existed.

    The New York Magazine, the WSJ, and even the Village Voice, write about Chasidim, and people just can’t get enough. so NYT writes hoping to give people what they want. but at this point, they get no attention from Jewish sources. When they come to Chabad to write a story, and no one would talk to them. They know that they don;t have us as friends.

    Hope they shrivel up and die away.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    if the new york times goes under, there is no other newspaper worth reading, unfortunately.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    I read the NYT daily, and find that nothing helps with the .. shall we say regulating the body in the WC… as that rag. Unfortunately I’m addicted to it, and they do have some good writers, and I like to read. But so many of my friends have said good riddance. I wish I could too. In today’s times (no pun intended) when we have BH so many lawyers and MDs who are proud to go with the tzurah of a Yid I have only this question: How many Orthodox Jews with yarmulkes, or married woman with orthodox lvush, do they have in their NEWSROOM

    good american
    good american
    14 years ago

    facts are that people are buying less papers and reading more news online; however, religious jews MUST buy newspapers, because we need to have what to read on shabbos! so in a few years the only newspapers available on paper will be the yated and the hamodia along with some other less popular jewish papers!!

    Liepa
    Liepa
    14 years ago

    If #29 and #31 seem to like the ‘all the lies thats fit to print’ then I think they need their head examined.

    NYT bankrupt
    NYT bankrupt
    14 years ago

    Almost! bezras hashem