Washington – House Passes Repeal of Health Care Law

    39

    Washington – After a heated midterm election, the Republican-led House easily passed legislation to repeal the nation’s sweeping health care law.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The vote was 245-189. There were four Democrats that voted for repeal.

    Overturning the law was a major campaign plank for Republicans in the 2010 elections, and many of the House’s nearly 100 new lawmakers promised to repeal the law that was pushed by President Obama and congressional Democrats.

    House Speaker John Boehner said the law would add nearly $1.5 trillion to the deficit and stifle the growth of some small businesses, which are required under the law to provide health insurance to employees or face penalties. A key issue for Republicans is that the law requires all Americans to have health insurance.

    “Let’s stop payment on this check before it can destroy more jobs and put us in an even deeper hole,” Boehner said. “Then let’s work together to put in place reforms that lower costs without destroying jobs or bankrupting this government.”

    Democrats failed in their procedural attempt to send the repeal bill back to committee for a discussion. Meanwhile, House Republicans are already preparing for four House committees to take the next step in the repeal effort and figure out ways to change the law.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has vowed to block the measure, and Obama has threatened to veto it.

    Reid denounced the House’s repeal vote as a political stunt.

    “This is nothing more than partisan grandstanding at a time when we should be working together to create jobs and strengthen the middle class,” he said in a statement today.

    Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., said the House was not engaged in a stunt. “This is not symbolic. This is why we were sent here,” said Bachmann, a favorite of the small-government Tea Party movement.

    House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., challenged Reid and Senate Democrats to show their votes and debate the measure if they are so confident of stopping the repeal effort.

    “The American people deserve a full hearing,” Cantor said this morning. “They deserve to see this legislation go to the Senate for a full vote.”

    Obama said he’s willing to work with both Democrats and Republicans to improve the law, but “we can’t go backward.”

    The only surprise in Wednesday’s vote was how many Democrats would support the repeal effort.

    The House has 13 Democrats, most of them members of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition, who voted against the health care bill last year when it passed the House. Several Blue Dogs, such as Florida’s Allen Boyd, lost re-election in November partly because they voted “yes” on the health care legislation.

    One issue key to the repeal debate is how much the law costs and the impact overturning it would have on the deficit. USA TODAY’s Kelly Kennedy reports Republicans say the law will add $701 billion to the deficit while Democrats say repealing the measure will cost $230 billion.

    Yesterday, Cantor sought to ease concerns from seniors who might think they would have to return $250 they received under the law to help pay for prescription drug costs. Democrats such as Rep. Ed Markey of Massachusetts have said throughout the repeal debate that seniors could be among those affected the most by overturning the law.

    Shortly after the law was passed last year, about 2.8 million recipients of Medicare who have a gap in their prescription drug coverage (known as the doughnut hole) received $250 checks to help them defray the cost of medicines.

    Asked yesterday whether Republicans would seek to have that money returned, Cantor said no.

    “If a repeal bill passes … the intention is not to require seniors to return the $250 checks they received,” Cantor said at his weekly news briefing.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    39 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    PrettyBoyFloyd
    PrettyBoyFloyd
    13 years ago

    Well, that’s as about as far as it’s gonna go, it’s never gonna pass in the senate. And even if it did, the prez would veto it.

    curious
    curious
    13 years ago

    When people try to stop what Obama favors it is stopping progress. When others try to pass laws it is grandstanding. Am I missing something?

    charliehall
    charliehall
    13 years ago

    Cantor is lying; there is nothing in the bill that would protect the seniors.

    13 years ago

    Mazal tov! Thank you Cong. West!

    Next to go in 2012 all the south florida dems. Wilson, waserman-schultz, hastings, deutch. Most importantly we will fire senator bill nelson.

    Just watch 🙂

    13 years ago

    I can’t understand why Americans are against any type of universal medical coverage.

    As Avos 2:1 says: The middle path is the best.

    As an Australian we are extremely fortunate to live in a country that gives the citizens CHOICE. There are *both* public health care AND private insurance options. For those who can afford private insurance they have the benefit of ‘skipping to the front of the queue’. For those who can’t afford insurance, they are not left on the street to die because they can’t afford the operation. You might have to wait a few months (depending on the urgency) but you WILL get the operation — unlike in the US if you don’t have the money for an expensive operation you won’t be treated.

    So please explain why having a choice between public or private health insurance is such a terrible thing?

    To me most of the arguments I read on VIN are based on fear, dogma and politics then on rationality and pragmatics.

    13 years ago

    What a waste of time & taxpayers money if they know they can’t make it thru the Senate. We need to work on all the Senators – Democrats, Socialists & Republicans with a “warning” – WE’LL REMEMBER YOU IN THE NEXT ELECTION NOT SO FAR AWAY. Remind them what happened in 2010.

    PMOinFL
    PMOinFL
    13 years ago

    If these idiots are done wasting buckets of my money on a bill that could never pass. I’d like to see them get down to business. I’m tired of this garbage. I pay these people to take action to better the country not posture for the cheap press.

    GET TO WORK ALREADY!

    13 years ago

    Empty symbolism — the only thing Republicans are good at.

    yaakov doe
    Member
    yaakov doe
    13 years ago

    Does this mean that the boys learning in yeshiva won’t be able to get the extra years of insurance on their parents’ policies to age 26 that the law provided for?

    13 years ago

    Does anyone here remember the days when health insurance was dominated by “indemnity” policies? The system worked, and worked well. The insurance business was not profitable, but it was not a loss either. Doctors and hospitals practiced medicine, following the scientific advances that were added to their medical training. There were problems with this system. Abuse was possible. Some costs skyrocketed due to technological and other scientific advances. Other costs went through the roof because exorbitant malpractice premiums were passed on to the consumers. So the system was reformed to create health maintenance organizations (HMO’s) that would regulate health care. This idea had the backing of insurance companies, and lawyers and politicians joined the party. There became oodles of money for everyone, except hospitals, physicians, and other providers. There were many services denied, and health care became a jungle. Some states watched their medical professionals abandon the field, and become business entrepreneurs. Obamacare will take that concept to new heights, regulating everything, from who buys to who gets treated. We need reform, but this is Sodom.

    Mark Levin
    Mark Levin
    13 years ago

    I heard on the radio today that the White House wants to have a law where everyone has to buy dog food. The thinking is that each and every person by buying dog food will save 200 a month & the price of the dog food won’t go up because everyone will have to buy it.

    13 years ago

    I will go on the record here…

    Every one of my doctors opposes Obamacare.. and thats a LOT of doctors.

    I just saw Dr Dearald Brackman a few days ago out in LA, the King of Jordan flew in to be operated by him.. or how about Dr Tse at Bascom Palmer in Miami who has a chair endowed by another Arab?

    Its trial lawyers that support obamacare.. you think THEY care about your healthcare?

    I met with a frum guy 2 days ago regarding life insurance.. and yes its expensive because I have a pre existing condition.. I am also a non smoker in great shape so I got decent rates.

    The united states of America health care is unsurpassed.. so you go to a clinic in cleveland thats pretty much a charity clinic and decide we need socialized medicine ?

    The unites states government is NOT a charity organization!!

    The House Clinic in LA chose by their own free will to drop united health care because the outgoing ceo stands to take 1 billion in bonuses.. thats FREE MARKET!!

    Free market demands that apple open its phones to CDMA.. free market tells AT&T hasta lavista!

    The EU is bankrupt.. their socialized healthcare system is BROKEN and USELESS…

    Go move there if you want.. leave my country alone!

    Member
    13 years ago

    Repealing health care advances is just plain HERESY.