Washington – Reid: House GOP Plan A ‘Blatant Attack On Bipartisanship’

3

U.S. President Barack Obama meets U.S. Senate Democrats including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) (R) in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, October 12, 2013. REUTERS/Jason ReedWashington – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on Tuesday that an alternative debt limit and government funding plan promoted by conservative Republicans in the House of Representatives could not win approval in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Reid said the plan, which was discussed at a House Republican meeting on Tuesdays morning, was “an extreme piece of legislation and it’s nothing more than a blatant attack on bipartisanship.”

Earlier, House Speaker John Boehner said no decisions had been made to bring the House plan up for a vote. The proposal would track several key parameters of an emerging deal that Reid is negotiating with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell but it would require some concessions on “Obamacare” health reforms and add some other restrictions on funding and borrowing.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark Levin
Mark Levin
10 years ago

When will it become clear and obvious to the Obamabots out there that the Republicans have submitted many proposals over the last many?weeks and months BUT THE DEMOCREEPS LIKE OBAMA AND REID HAVE NO INTENTION WHATSOEVER TO GIVE AN INCH? ????

Obama Kool Aid drinkers need to wake up.

10 years ago

REID take a long walk in the nevada desert

Reb Yid
Reb Yid
10 years ago

i don’t want bipartisanship. I want the government to stop spending my money any more than absolutely necessary. Payments to welfare bums, and payments to support Obamacare subsidies so that employers don’t have to pay for health insurance for their employees are certainly not absolutely necessary.