New York – A company that publishes books by Laura Ingraham, Mark Levin, Ann Coulter and other conservative authors says it wants nothing to do anymore with The New York Times and its best-seller list.
Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Regnery Publishing said on Monday it will no longer recognize the Times’ accounting of book sales, meaning its writers can no longer claim to be “New York Times best-selling authors.” That’s a big deal in the book business.
Regnery is annoyed that its book “The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left” was only No. 7 on the Times’ latest best-sellers list even though another organization that tracks sales ranked it No. 1. Regnery says another of its books, “No Go Zones: How Sharia Law is Coming to a Neighborhood Near You,” is also not ranked as highly by the Times as it deserves to be.
The Times noted that conservative authors have routinely ranked high and in great numbers on its best-sellers list.
“Our goal is that the lists reflect authentic best sellers,” Times spokesman Jordan Cohen said. “The political views of authors have no bearing on our rankings, and the notion that we would manipulate the lists to exclude books for political reasons is simply ludicrous.”
The newspaper is a frequent target of conservatives and Republicans, including President Donald Trump. But it’s unusual for a publisher to say, effectively, that it’s taking its ball and going home.
Regnery says the Times’ list gives priority to liberal books.
The publishing company’s writers, besides no longer being allowed to use the Times’ rankings to promote themselves, will no longer get bonuses tied to their books appearing on the newspaper’s list.
“I ask you to consider this: We are often told it’s foolish to bite the hand that feeds you,” Marji Ross, president and publisher of Regnery, said in a letter to its authors. “I say it’s just as foolish to feed the hand that bites you.”
Book sales are an inexact science. Nielsen BookScan, the measurement that Regnery cites as ranking its books higher, counts print sales in stores representing about 85 percent of the market. The Times says its list is based on surveys of thousands of booksellers.
Great news! ..hopefully, this will start a trend.
NYTimes = Fake News Par Excellence!
Website of Nielsen BookScan claims it uses “sales information from point of sale systems in more than 35,500 bookshops around the world” That implies boosktores that have no connected point of sale system are exlcuded. But Wikipedia places the New York Times list as only U.S. based, not world based. “It is based on weekly sales reports obtained from selected samples of independent and chain bookstores and wholesalers throughout the United States … The exact method for compiling the data obtained from the booksellers is classified as a trade secret … 4,000 bookstores as well as an unstated number of wholesalers.”
I have to be suspicious of “trade secrets” in what is supposed to be a scientific analysis of data. But even what is known has been criticized (see Wikipedia for a list of 7 specific criticisms of methodology).
But the real shocker is the following:
> The Times countered that the list was not mathematically objective but rather was editorial content and thus protected under the Constitution as free speech.
One would think that says it all.
If the books from one of their authors does make the NY Times best seller list, as has actually happened in the past, there’s no way they will stop the author from publicizing it. If it helps them make money, they’ll use it.