Probe Sought In Trump Administration’s Ouster Of Scientist

6
President Donald Trump speaks about the coronavirus in the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House, Wednesday, April 22, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Calls mounted Thursday for an investigation into the ouster of a senior government scientist who says he’s being punished for opposing widespread use of an unproven drug President Donald Trump touted as a remedy for COVID-19.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Rick Bright, former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, says he was summarily removed from his job earlier this week and reassigned to a lesser role because he resisted political pressure to allow widespread use of hydroxychloroquine, a malaria drug favored by Trump.

On Thursday, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone, D-N.J., joined in calling for an investigation by the Health and Human Services inspector general.

“Removing Dr. Bright in the midst of a pandemic would raise serious concerns under any circumstances, but his allegations that political considerations influenced this decision heighten those concerns and demand full accountability,” Pallone said. The inspector general’s office had no immediate response.

Bright is seeking to be reinstated as head of the research agency, said his lawyers Debra Katz and Lisa Banks. A performance review shows he received a top rating.

Controversy has swirled around hydroxychloroquine since Trump started promoting it from the podium in the White House briefing room.

BARDA, the agency that Bright formerly headed, is a unit of HHS created to counter threats from bioterrorism and infectious diseases. It has recently been trying to jump-start work on a vaccine for the coronavirus.

“I am speaking out because to combat this deadly virus, science — not politics or cronyism — has to lead the way,” Bright, who has a doctoral degree in immunology, said a statement released Wednesday by his lawyers.

“Specifically, and contrary to misguided directives, I limited the broad use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, promoted by the administration as a panacea, but which clearly lack scientific merit,” Bright said.

“I also resisted efforts to fund potentially dangerous drugs promoted by those with political connections,” he added.

Asked about Bright at Wednesday’s briefing, Trump said he “never heard of him.”

“The guy says he was pushed out of a job,” Trump said. “Maybe he was. Maybe he wasn’t. … I don’t know who he is.”

Bright’s lawyers said Thursday they will soon file formal complaints with the HHS inspector general and the Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that has as part of its charge the protection of government whistleblowers.

“While I am prepared to look at all options and to think ‘outside the box’ for effective treatments, I rightly resisted efforts to provide an unproven drug on demand to the American public,” Bright wrote in his statement.

He also alluded to “clashes with HHS political leadership” over his efforts to “invest early in vaccines and supplies critical to saving American lives.” One of the major criticisms of the Trump administration’s pandemic response is that little was done in the month of February to stockpile needed equipment.

“Science, in service to the health and safety of the American people, must always trump politics,” Bright said.

Trump has repeatedly touted the malaria drug during his regular coronavirus briefings, calling it a “game changer,” and suggesting its skeptics would be proved wrong. He has offered patient testimonials that the drug is a lifesaver.

But a recent study of 368 patients in U.S. veterans hospitals found no benefit from hydroxychloroquine — and more deaths. The study was an early look at the medication, which has prompted debate in the medical community, with many doctors leery of using it.

In a statement, HHS confirmed that Bright is no longer at the BARDA agency, but did not address his allegations of political interference in scientific matters.

HHS said it was Bright who had requested an emergency use authorization for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. For his part, Bright said he had insisted that the authorization be limited to a restricted group of patients, those hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 under the supervision of a doctor.

Hydroxychloroquine was given to patients in the New York area, the nation’s most intense COVID-19 hot spot. It is usually administered in combination with the antibiotic azithromycin.

An official biography describes Bright as a flu and infectious-disease expert who joined the agency 10 years ago and was focused on vaccine development. He also held the title of HHS deputy assistant secretary for preparedness and response, reporting to Dr. Robert Kadlec.

Bright’s performance review shows he got the highest rating — “Level 5 – Achieved Outstanding Results” — in federal fiscal year 2019.

“Dr. Bright continues a very successful tenure in leading BARDA performing an essential (HHS) mission of developing and acquiring medical countermeasures for the Strategic National Stockpile,” wrote Kadlec, his boss, adding, “I have confidence” that Bright would meet future challenges facing the agency.

A copy of Bright’s performance review was provided to The Associated Press.

HHS said Bright is now assigned to the National Institutes of Health, working on new approaches to testing.

His allegations were first reported by The New York Times.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Whistleblower
Whistleblower
4 years ago

Bright ain’t too bright.
Who does he think he is? People get hired and fired.
Anything to aggravate our president.
Look at this !!! Debra Katz is his lawyer.
That radical Jew Coup-tress herself.
Filth.

AH
AH
4 years ago

At some point, people have got to accept that Trump is the president of the United States, having been sworn into that position on Jan. 20, 2017, and is thus the head of the executive branch with all of the powers pertaining to it, including the power to fire officials who are part of that branch. A good part of the problems the country faces – and yes, that includes much in connection with the coronavirus pandemic – is due to people, at all levels of the federal and state governments as well as among the general citizenry, who simply are unable to accept what occurred on Nov. 8, 2016, and thereafter, and style themselves “the resistance” and the like.

Now of course I know good and well that some commenters are going to deliberately mischaracterize the above, and claim that I’m saying that everybody in the executive branch better kowtow to Trump and just be his yes-men. Those who are more fairly inclined will understand that it means nothing of the sort, and that there is a world of difference between internally disagreeing with your boss and working to convince him of your position, while recognizing that the decision is ultimately his to make, versus making public statements to the effect that your authority exceeds his.

ahah
ahah
4 years ago

“what occurred on Nov 2016” Just read the recently published report by the REPUBLICAN Senate about the Russians, FBI etc in the 2016 Election. You are correct about the Govt. and citizenry will not except the Russian Intelligence involvement in 2016 election. Fake Election (Trump openly called it Fake just a few days before nov) Hopefully in a few months it will be all over and “All levels of Federal and State Governments and Citizenry” will have their rights reinstated by a REAL Election without any foreign enemy’s involvement.

Doc
Doc
4 years ago

The guy is a deep state idiot.
He wants to stop using a cheap and very effective drug that saves lives to push his political agenda!
I have been using this drug heavily on over 30 patients with very good results. No side effects seen. You need to give it longer than the 7 days in the protocol or they die in the second week though.

anonymous
anonymous
4 years ago

Breaking:
He was going to be fired 2 months ago anyway for incompetence.