US Mandates Vaccines Or Tests For Big Companies By Jan. 4

8
In this Saturday, Oct. 23, 2021, photograph, a sign notifies customers that COVID-19 vaccinations are available at a pharmacy in a grocery store in Monument, Colo. Millions of U.S. workers now have a Jan. 4 deadline to get a COVID vaccine. The federal government on Thursday, Nov. 4, 2021 announced new vaccine requirements for workers at companies with more than 100 employees as well as workers at health care facilities that treat Medicare and Medicaid patients. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

Tens of millions of Americans who work at companies with 100 or more employees will need to be vaccinated against COVID-19 by Jan. 4 or get tested for the virus weekly under government rules that took effect Thursday.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


The Occupational Safety and Health Administration said companies that fail to comply could face penalties of nearly $14,000 per violation.

The new requirements, which were first previewed by President Joe Biden in September, will apply to about 84 million workers at medium and large businesses, although it is not clear how many of those employees are unvaccinated.

Tougher rules will apply to another 17 million people who work in nursing homes, hospitals and other facilities that receive money from Medicare and Medicaid. Those workers will not have an option for testing and will need to be vaccinated.

It was unclear how OSHA planned to enforce the rules. A senior administration official said the agency would target companies if it gets complaints.

Workers will be able to ask for exemptions on medical or religious grounds.

The release of the rules followed weeks of regulatory review and meetings with business groups, labor unions and others. The regulations form the cornerstone of Biden’s most aggressive effort yet to combat the spread of COVID-19, which has killed more than 740,000 people in the U.S.

OSHA drafted the rules under emergency authority meant to protect workers from an imminent health hazard. Senior administration officials said the rules preempt conflicting state laws or orders, including those that ban employers from requiring vaccinations, testing or the wearing of face masks.

The administration will face an immediate challenge from Republican state officials who are eager to fight Biden in court. More than two dozen Republicans serving as state attorneys general have indicated they plan to sue, arguing that only Congress can enact such sweeping requirements under emergency authority.

Last week, 19 states sued to stop Biden’s narrower mandate that employees of federal contractors be vaccinated. That requirement was scheduled to take effect Dec. 8, but the administration said Thursday it will be delayed until Jan. 4 to match the requirements on other large employers and health care providers.

Workers will need to receive either two doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine or one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine by Jan. 4. Unvaccinated employees must submit a verified negative test to the company at least once a week and wear face masks on the job.

Employees who test positive must be removed from the workplace.

OSHA will require businesses to provide paid time off for employees to get vaccines and sick leave to recover from side effects that prevent them from working. The requirements for masks and paid time off for shots will take effect Dec. 5.

Because vaccines are free, OSHA said, companies do not have to provide or pay for tests.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued a rule requiring vaccination for workers in 76,000 health facilities and home health care providers that get funding from the government health programs. A senior administration official said that several large private health care organizations imposed their own mandates and achieved high vaccination rates — 96% or higher — without widespread resignations.

The White House sees the new requirements as a potent tool to winnow down the ranks of the tens of millions of Americans who have thus far refused to get a shot.

For weeks, Biden has encouraged businesses not to wait for the OSHA rule to take effect. He has touted businesses that have already announced their own vaccine mandates and urged other companies to follow their lead.

Administration officials say those efforts are paying off, with about 70% of the nation’s adults now fully vaccinated.

However, some companies have expressed fear that some vaccine-hesitant workers might quit, leaving their workforces even thinner in what is already a tight labor market.

Several large business groups complained about the timing of the mandate. Retail groups worried that the requirement could disrupt their operations during the critical Christmas shopping period. Retailers and others also said it could worsen supply chain disruptions.

The mandate on federal contractors led to demonstrations by opponents, including workers at a NASA rocket engine test site in Mississippi. Some said they are immune because they contracted COVID-19. Others said vaccines violated their religious beliefs and constitutional rights.

“No one should be forced to take a medical treatment just to keep their job,” said Nyla Trumbach, an engineer at the site. “There’s years and years of experience and skill out here, and I just want anyone who’s watching to see what we stand to lose here if these people don’t keep their jobs.”

Dozens of groups sought meetings with administration officials to air their concerns and objections to likely provisions of the OSHA rule, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the AFL-CIO and anti-vaccine organizations.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lastword
Noble Member
lastword
2 years ago

This evil decree must fall apart. It is against the international laws of the Nuremberg Code to force a medical procedure on an individual, and this has been supported and buttressed by specific legislation in all Western countries and many other countries since. Coercion is also properly considered duress.

The Covid virus has never been isolated – the PCR test analyzes common cold algorithms by a ‘fill-in-the-blanks’ computer program that decrees a ‘positive’ result. It is widely debated as useful except as a political tool for creating totalitarianism and has already been abused, having no standard of use, and by testing with greater amplification in communities with low ‘vaccination’ rates. Very worrisome and unfortunate.

Additionally, it has been suggested that since the Delta variant in March, most ‘Covid case hospital admissions’ are due to the ‘covid shot’ adverse effects itself and presents a different symptomalogy than the initial ‘covid breakouts’.

The FDA and CDC have interlocking board members with Big Pharma corporations and forced through the approval of the inoculation despite better advisement not to do so. It is not necessary, especially for younger people, and is actually illegal being that they already approved the ‘Comarnity’ formulation which is not being made available (as compensation for injury claims would have to be included with its use – since it is not a EUA having been approved). Being that there now is an approved formulation, the EUA for non-Comarnity versions of this shot are actually no longer legal – and there is no compensation being offered for injury of any type if taking this shot. Therefore, for this reason alone these laws are coercive, tyrannical and against international law and must be reversed. They are sponsored by the Sodomite BigPharma institutions which doesn’t bode well for anyone in the long run. Resist. Protest. Insist on change. Now.

Sara
Sara
2 years ago

Funny that FDA authorized the use of comirnaty which strangely is not available. So far just the Pfizer covid vaccine under EUA is what u can get
The reason is that EUA products have much less liability for company and government so they don’t want those products out yet
So they’re going to keep using an EUA product to deny liability and they “approved” a not yet available product to promote vaccine uptake
People don’t realize the vial they get is not considered an approved drug and thus has different legal fine print
Most of which basically exempted everyone from damage
Some of the lawsuits in progress against mandates says this exact point- that the authorized drug is not available and the EUA vax can’t be mandated by law

Let's go Brandon Poopy Pants Biden.
Let's go Brandon Poopy Pants Biden.
2 years ago

Not under OSHAs perview, will be struck down.