Orthodox Rabbis Don’t Enter Churches. So Why Was Britain’s Chief Rabbi At St. Paul’s Cathedral?

83

LONDON (JTA) — Most Orthodox interpretations of Jewish law conclude that Jews are forbidden to enter churches, even if no prayer will be taking place.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


So why was British Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis present on Friday at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London, where he attended a prayer service in honor of Queen Elizabeth II’s 70-year anniversary on the throne?

The answer dates back to a ruling from the 1970s by the London Beth Din, the Orthodox rabbinical court, which allows rabbis to attend Christian religious ceremonies only if the rabbi’s presence is requested by the monarch.

And Mirvis’ presence was indeed requested at St. Paul’s, where he joined a select group of dignitaries and clergy for The Queen’s Platinum Jubilee 2022 — a four-day bash to celebrate the legacy of the longest-serving monarch in British history.

Mirvis was among 2,000 elites attending the Service of Thanksgiving Friday at St. Paul’s, a massive 17th-century English Baroque-style structure that is the top church of the Diocese of London.

All eyes were naturally on Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle, whose attendance was the first time in over two years since they moved to California amid a rift in the family over allegations by Markle, whose mother is Black, that she was subjected to racist treatment by top members of the royal family.

Queen Elizabeth, 96, was absent from the ceremony. In a statement by Buckingham Palace, the Royal House said that she is sitting the service out with “great reluctance” after considering the “journey and activity required.” She did take part in a beacon-lighting ceremony on Thursday evening.

Whether Jews may enter churches has been the subject of debate for centuries. Many rabbis who have considered the issue have concluded that churches are the site of “avodah zara,” or idol worship, which is strictly prohibited under Jewish law. But others, including in the Conservative movement in the United States, have taken cues from a 13th-century rabbi who decided that Christians were not idol worshippers and decided that entering churches can be permissible — opening the door to interfaith relations.

In the United States, some controversy arose over Rabbi Haskel Lookstein’s participation at the inaugural church services for President Barack Obama, where the Orthodox rabbi recited a non-denominational prayer. He faced criticism from one Orthodox group, but rebuffed it by citing British rabbis’ attendance at events in Westminster Abbey.

In the United Kingdom, the issue of what to do about royal events was resolved in the 1970s, according to Herschel Gluck, a haredi Orthodox rabbi in London.

“It’s pretty much consensus at this point” that rabbis should not enter churches, he said. But, he told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, “the only exception is when the monarch requests it.”

Previous chief rabbis may have been even more lenient on this point.

The late Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits, who had held Mirvis’ position for 25 years until 1991, explained his approach in a 1995 book. “After consultation with the [London] Beth Din, my own practice is occasionally to attend Church services on royal and state occasions to represent the Jewish community,” he wrote. “But I never actively participate, nor do I wear cap and gown. I find that my Christian hosts usually show understanding and respect for this attitude and its reservations.”

He did not mention a royal invitation as a prerequisite to attending such events.

Part of the reason for the consensus around the concession may be connected to the presence of the royal family in Jewish worship in the United Kingdom.

Since 1801, when the first siddurs, or prayer books, were printed, British Jews have been reciting a prayer for the monarch each Shabbat and on other holy days as part of Shacharit, the morning prayer service. (Dutch Jews have been doing so for even longer, since 1642 at least, and reciting a prayer for the country is common in many countries.)

The current wording of the prayer, from 1962, 10 years after Queen Elizabeth rose to the throne, begins with: “Our Sovereign Lady, Queen Elizabeth (II), Elizabeth the Queen Mother, Philip Duke of Edinburgh, Charles Prince of Wales and all the Royal Family. May the supreme King of kings in his mercy preserve the Queen in life, guard her and deliver her from all trouble and sorrow.”

Mirvis, the chief rabbi, authored a special prayer for the Jubilee, in which he wrote: “Seventy years have passed since Her Majesty the Queen ascended the throne. Together with all our fellow citizens, we fervently pray that she be granted many more years of blessing so that she may continue to bring honour and glory to the Crown and to all her people.

The Jews’ relationship with the British royalty hasn’t always been this harmonious. In 1290, Edward I signed an edict of expulsion for all of the kingdom’s Jews. They did not return until the 17th century, though the politics behind the de-facto lifting of the expulsion are disputed.

Fast forward a few centuries, though, some of Britain’s best-known Jewish persons were prominently present at the Jubilee event for the cameras and behind the scenes.

Marie van der Zyl, the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, had front-row seats. She wore a dark-blue dress along with, per the informal dress code, a matching hat, decorated with a white satin fabric.

For most Britons, the main event of the jubilee celebrations is yet to come in the Platinum Jubilee Pageant scheduled for June 5 at Buckingham Palace.

A free event, it will offer “all the excitement and spectacle of an international parade and carnival” with “street arts, theatre, music, circus, carnival and costume to celebrate Her Majesty’s unwavering duty, love of the natural world and dedication to the Commonwealth,” the event’s website says.

The man responsible for that bit of magic is a Jewish Londoner named David Zolkwer, a 56-year-old professional show director and chief producer of the Jubilee festivities.

He worked on the 2011 wedding of Kate Middleton and Prince William and the 1997 handover ceremony in Hong Kong.

He wouldn’t have gotten to where he is if it were not for the Jewish yet pluralistic upbringing that he received from his parents and at Manchester’s King David Jewish school, he told the Jewish Chronicle.

“I’m grateful that my parents made that call,” he said of the school, “because it was about opening my eyes to a broader community and a broader picture of what society is like.”

 


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


83 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sander
Sander
1 year ago

Anonymous is an ignoramus. As of late the London Bais Din is led by rabbis who are ardent Agudists. Rav Menachem Gelley and Rav Chanoch Ehrentreu are hardly “Religious Zionist”. The heter for a shtadlan b’chotzer hamelech to participate in and even violate Mitzvos of the Torah is cited in Chazal.

Not in kollel
Not in kollel
1 year ago

What’s worse ? Entering a church or high profile brothers battling in secular courts in NY ?

Last edited 1 year ago by Not in kollel
Huh?
Huh?
1 year ago

This has been going on forever so I’m not sure what the big deal is. Some say it’s Avodah Zarah some say its not. So when its easy to do we side with being Machmir and when it’s not we’re Mekil. It’s pretty easy for your average Jew to not go in a church so we don’t. But following these same laws about doing business with Avodah Zarah we’re Mekil as not doing business with Christians leading up to Christmas is usually not feasible. The same goes for Halloween. We’re Machmir it’s Paganism so we don’t trick or treat but we’re (most are) Mekil that it’s not Paganism when it comes to giving out candy because it creates good will.
So if the Rabbi felt it was important to attend why are people negatively judging him especially when you don’t know the situation he’s in.

Last edited 1 year ago by Huh?
Voice of reason
Voice of reason
1 year ago

Well it’s a different type of monarchy these days, they don’t hold any power. Maybe the bet din should decide what the halacha is nowadays

Charles B Hall
Charles B Hall
1 year ago

Four Orthodox Rabbis attended the funeral of Pope John Paul II.

Sedom
Sedom
1 year ago

Is this the same wicked evil country that pulled the plug on a helpless Jewish child that was hooked up to life support???! They even refused to let the child be transferred to a different Country?!

Nachum
Nachum
1 year ago

Regarding the overall discussion about the Queens’ 70 years on the throne, I say enough already! I lost all respect for her, when it was revealed the shabby manner, in which she treated Diana. Then, she initially refused to make any public statements following Diana’s tragic death. It was only because of pressure from the public, and from Prime Minister Tony Blair, that her Majesty was forced to issue a statement, whereby she stated that “Diana was an extraordinary human being”. However, her statement at that time was not from the heart, and it was meaningless.

Dif
Dif
1 year ago

Better to be on trial for govt grant fraud to raise money for a Cheder than to attend a church. We know it’s better because the Oylem will raise money for the Chasid on trial while who’s going to give money for the Rabbi to attend church?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Shomu Shamayim.

Where is the outcry here at the gross chilul Hashem of someone whose political position is “Chief Rabbi” yet has no problem attending a ceremony in a church, something that our ancestors, even simple/unlearned ones, would have given up their lives before doing?

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

His predecessor used the excuse of “mipnei eivah”, recognizing full well that he was doing was obviously forbidden.

Aguttenshabbos
Aguttenshabbos
1 year ago

Rabbi Yossi Mizrachi was right all along about Ephraim Mirvis. Enough of these softy lefty liberals.

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

Rabbi Mirvis is a “Religious Zionist” and The “London Beth Din” is the same.

“Religious Zionism” is, itself, idolatry (mixed with religion).

That’s all you need to know.