US CAPITOL (VINnews) Republican and Democratic members of Congress shredded three university presidents Tuesday at a hearing about rampant campus antisemitism.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
The presidents of Harvard, UPenn and MIT all weakly attempted to defend their policies, yet sounded pitifully weak and equivocated their positions, rather than bluntly condemning hate speech.
All three school leaders used speaking time to highlight efforts they have made to protect Jewish students, yet their answers failed to satisfy lawmakers.
Rep. Donald Norcross (D-N.J.) went after Magill for a festival that was held at UPenn by students where antisemitic speakers were invited.
While Magill said she personally condemns those speakers’ views, she added the school will not “censor based on the content.”
Norcross then asked if Magill would allow speakers with racist views at her campus, to which she only responded that the school would “follow our policies.”
Harvard President Claudine Gay took some of the biggest hits. Gay said it is a hard task balancing free speech with safety in these times, admitting in her opening statement she had “not always gotten it right.”
GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik questioned the presidents regarding their position on statements advocating for the genocide of Jewish people. Despite repeated grilling, the university presidents would not say that calling for the genocide of Jewish people would violate their schools’ codes of conduct.
Stefanik, a Harvard alum, spoke six times, and she peppered Gay with questions while reiterating her calls for the school president’s resignation.
She asked each university president if the call to genocide against Jewish people violates bullying or harassment policies on their campuses.
“If the speech becomes conduct, it can be harassment,” Magill said.
“Conduct meaning committing the act of genocide?” Stefanik fired back.
Each president said that it depends on the context of how the call is made, leading Stefanik to say such answers are “unacceptable.”
Here is a partial transcript:
Congresswoman Stefanik: Dr. Gay, a Harvard student calling for the mass murder of African Americans is not protected free speech at Harvard, correct?
President Gay: Our commitment to free speech –
Congresswoman Stefanik: It’s a yes or no question. Is that correct? Is that okay for students to call for the mass murder of African Americans at Harvard? Is the protected free speech?
President Gay: Our commitment to free speech –
Congresswoman Stefanik: It’s a yes or no question. Let me ask you this: you are president of Harvard so I assume you are familiar with the term “Intifada,” correct?
President Gay: I have heard that term, yes.
Congresswoman Stefanik: And you understand that the use of the term “intifada” in the context of the Israeli-Arab conflict is indeed a call for violent armed resistance against the State of Israel, including violence against civilians and the genocide of Jews. Are you aware of that?
President Gay: That type of hateful speech is personally abhorrent to me.
Congresswoman Stefanik: And there have been multiple marches at Harvard with student chanting “There is only one solution. Intifada revolution” and “Globalize the Intifada,” is that correct?
President Gay: I’ve heard that thoughtless, reckless, and hateful language on our campus, yes.
Congresswoman Stefanik: So based upon your testimony, you understand that this call for intifada is to commit genocide against the Jewish people in Israel and globally, correct?
President Gay: I will say again, that type of hateful speech is personally abhorrent to me.
Congresswoman Stefanik: Do you believe that type of hateful speech is contrary to Harvard’s Code of Conduct or is it allowed at Harvard?
President Gay: It is at odds with the values of Harvard.
Congresswoman Stefanik: Can you not say here that it is against the Code of Conduct at Harvard?
President Gay: We embrace a commitment to free expression even of views that are objectionable, offensive, hateful – it’s when that speech crosses into conduct that violates our policies against bullying, harassment, intimidation…
Congresswoman Stefanik: Does that speech not cross that barrier? Does that speech not call for the genocide of Jews and the elimination of Israel? You testified that you understand that that is the definition of “intifada.” Is that speech according to the Code of Conduct or not?
President Gay: We embrace a commitment to free expression and give a wide berth to free expression even of views that are objectionable, outrageous and offensive.
Congresswoman Stefanik: You and I both know that that is not the case. You are aware that Harvard ranked dead last when it came to free speech, are you not aware of that report?
President Gay: As I’ve observed earlier, I reject that characterization of our campus.
Congresswoman Stefanik: The data show’s it’s true and isn’t it true that Harvard previously rescinded multiple offers of admissions for applicants and accepted freshman for sharing offensive memes, racist statements, sometimes as young as 16-years-old. Did Harvard not rescind those offers of admission?
President Gay: That long predates my time as president so I can’t speak –
Congresswoman Stefanik: Well let me ask you this: will admission offers be rescinded or any disciplinary action be taken against students or applicants who say, “from the river to the sea” or “intifada” advocating for the murder of Jews.
President Gay: As I’ve said, that type of hateful, reckless, offensive speech is personally abhorrent to me.
Congresswoman Stefanik: No action will be taken? What action will be taken?
President Gay: When speech crosses into conduct that violates our policies, including policies against bullying, harassment and intimidation, we take action. We have robust disciplinary processes that allow us to hold individuals accountable.
Congresswoman Stefanik: What action has been taken against students who are harassing and calling for the genocide of jews on Harvards campus?
President Gay: I can assure you, we have robust disciplinary actions.
Congresswoman Stefanik: What actions have been taken? I’m not asking, I’m asking what actions have been taken against those students.
President Gay: Given students rights to privacy and our obligations under FERPA. I will not say more about any specific cases other than to reiterate that processes are ongoing.
Congresswoman Stefanik: Do you know what the number one hate crime in America is?
President Gay: I know that over the last couple of months there has been an alarming rise of antisemitism which I understand is the critical topic that we are here to discuss.
Congresswoman Stefanik: That’s correct. It is anti-Jewish hate crimes. And Harvard ranks the lowest when it comes to protecting Jewish students. This is why I have called for your resignation and your testimony today and not being able to answer with moral clarity speaks volumes.
Rep. Brandon Williams (R-N.Y.), who is a graduate of UPenn and was a visiting student at Harvard for a year, said it was “unfortunate” to be connected to such institutions after their behavior.
Trade these presidents for hostages.
I became dumber from hearing these intellectuals speak.
Those university presidents, are worse than Hamas , and if this is not gonna change very soon , this country is over Kaput !
I am always amazed that so called intelligent poople can be so stupid.
Whatever excuses they make, a soneh yisrael bleibt a soneh yisrael.
Credit to you Congresswoman Stefanik. Unbelievable exchange.
We are in galus! And the only people it’s acceptable to rile up hate against, are jews
Why don’t they just check up the written code for these schools of higher education and see if it includes these statements as against the code of conduct. If it isn’t included then these school presidents shouldn’t be fired, rather the schools should be closed down.
In America, the government cannot punish people for saying vile things.