New York, NY – In Reversal, Families of Slain Auxiliary Officers Will Receive U.S. Benefits

    4

    New York, NY – Reversing rulings that had prompted public protests, the U.S. Department of Justice announced today that the families of two unarmed auxiliary police officers who were killed last year by a gunman in Greenwich Village were entitled to federal death benefits.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    The department said it would award about $300,000 each to the families of the officers, Nicholas T. Pekearo and Yevgeniy Marshalik, under a program which is intended to compensate the survivors of police officers, firefighters and other public safety personnel across the nation who are killed in line of duty.

    Officers Pekearo, 28, and Marshalik, 19, were fatally shot on March 14, 2007, in a confrontation with David R. Garvin, who had fatally shot a bartender in a pizza restaurant.

    They were initially denied of the benefits on the grounds that auxiliary officers in the city are not authorized to make arrests and therefore did not qualify under federal guidelines.

    But Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly, went and testified on behalf of the officers' families before a Justice Department hearing officer.

    The Justice Department said it had been persuaded by Mr. Kelly's testimony and new evidence that had surfaced since the initial denial.

    "New evidence showed that the officers were killed by the gunman specifically because he thought they were regular police officers," the department said in a statement. [NY Times]


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    4 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    16 years ago

    Speaking as an auxiliary officer, 11:24 was right–if there’s one thing we are taught, it’s that we ARE not police, and these two did exactly that–imitated a police officer.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    16 years ago

    “So someone impersonating a police officer would also be entitled to this benefit for their surviving family?”

    That’s a pretty dumb comment.

    How can you possibly compare the ultimate sacrifice made by these two brave men, legitimate volunteer auxilliary officers, who devoted countless hours of their time to trying to protect the public — and not getting a dime for it — with some bum criminally impersonating a police officer?

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    16 years ago

    anonymous 11:24
    what an idiotic remark.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    16 years ago

    So someone impersonating a police officer would also be entitled to this benefit for their surviving family?