Washington – ‘Cash for clunkers’ Comes To The Laundry Room

    9

    laundryWashington – Next year may be to appliance buyers what 2009 was to car buyers: time for government rebates.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Modeled after the popular Cash for Clunkers program, which was intended to get cars with low gas mileage off the road, a federal appliance rebate program is launching in early 2010. It offers a boost to people buying energy-efficient clothes washers, refrigerators and other appliances — those that qualify for the federal “Energy Star” designation — and to manufacturers, whose sales fell 10 percent in 2008 and another 12 percent through mid-December this year.

    The program has only $300 million, one-tenth as much money as Cash for Clunkers, or about $1 per U.S resident, so it could run out fast. States are receiving roughly the same amount per capita, with California getting the most at $35.2 million, but what’s eligible varies by state
    Here’s what to keep in mind as you decide whether to swap your washer for that supposedly whisper-quiet model or your old white refrigerator for a shapely stainless-steel number.

    WHAT’S MY STATE OFFERING? For state by state information, visit the federal Web site energysavers.gov and click on “state appliance rebate program” on the right.

    California residents, for example, can get cash back on three types of appliances: $100 for washing machines, $75 for refrigerators and $50 for room air conditioners. Wisconsin offers rebates on washers and fridges plus $200 for boilers or furnaces, $75 for central air conditioning or geothermal heat pumps, $50 for freezers and $25 for dishwashers.

    (Also in effect through Dec. 31, 2010, is a federal tax credit for 30 percent of the cost up to $1,500 on equipment for a primary residence.)

    HOW DO I KNOW IT’S A DEAL? Joe McGuire, president of the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, said buying Energy Star appliances can mean hearty power savings. But it’s important to make sure you save enough in water and energy bills over time to justify paying for a new unit.

    “A good example is a 10-year-old clothes washer,” he said. “With Energy Star, you could reduce utility costs by $145 a year and save 5,000 gallons of water a year.”

    At that rate, a typical $500 to $700 dishwasher would pay for itself in four years. In larger households that use more power and water for laundry, the payoff can come much sooner.

    It’s probably not worth replacing appliances less than five to seven years old just because rebates are available, unless you plan to upgrade to a far more efficient model. That’s because newer appliances are already more efficient. But switching from a top-loading to front-loading clothes washer could in itself cut water use enough to make a purchase worthwhile.

    The older the appliance, the greater the possibility of saving money by buying a new one. McGuire says a 20-year-old refrigerator uses three times as much power as Energy Star-approved units made today, some of which run on less than 60 watts.

    “You would save over $250 a year on an average 20-year-old refrigerator if you replaced it,” McGuire said. “That’s about $1,200 over five years. That is real savings to consumers.”

    The Department of Energy estimates Americans saved more than $19 billion on utilities last year using Energy Star products.

    WHEN WILL IT END? Rebates will be available until February 2012 or the money’s gone. And Jen Stutsman, a spokeswoman for the Department of Energy, expects the funds to run out fast.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    9 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    For the many VIN readers that live in NYC;
    Please remember that savings often calculate cost of hot water based on using electricity. If you heat water with gas the savings are less. Please also consider that the front loading washers rotate at high speed and can really vibrate and damage the florr if it is not thick concrete. (They also spin very fast to drain water so you do save on drying expenses.)

    Monsey Man
    Monsey Man
    14 years ago

    While I detest government give-aways (of OUR money), from personal experience this one may actually make sense; certainly more than the previous cash for clunkers. Having done everything recommended to reduce our home utility bills (new windows etc.) I noticed no decrease in the cost of our utilities. This year we replaced our 25+ year old Maytags with new state-of-the-art Samsungs, and both our water usage (our machines seem to run every day) and Con Ed bills have dropped immediately and dramatically. For once buying something will actually pay for itself.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    More corporate welfare. What a crock.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    My wife is still blaming me for switching to a frontloader. The clothing all smell, especially if you leave them in for an extra 5 minutes. Just Google “Washing Machine Smell” to see how bad it is. If you want Shalom at home, keep the top loader.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    spread the wealth…….

    PMO
    PMO
    14 years ago

    Putting money into durable goods like this always makes sense. It gets people buying which in turn keeps people employed. It sounds like money very well spent. Anything that helps support big and small business right now is a good thing and will help keep jobless claims down (this month was the lowest in nearly 18 months by the way). At $1 per person, the jobs are more than worth it. Small businesses who sell these appliances will be able to start recovering thanks to your $1.

    I am a free-market capitalist, and would rather just see the money go back to tax payers directly. However, so long as the money is making its way back into the private-sector side of the economy I am not going to complain.

    Liberalism is a Disease!
    Liberalism is a Disease!
    14 years ago

    OMG!! This is so confusing! Typical bureaucratic gobbledygook! I cant figure this out for the life of me so the g’henim with them and I will continue to use my old fridge.

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    14 years ago

    I need to buy a new washer and dryer anyway, but don’t have old ones to trade in, and can’t figure out these incentives!! Oh well, I’ll keep the receipt and hope that TurboTax can figure it out for me in 2011…