New York, NY – Editorial: Why Donors Like Chabad

    12

    The Kinas Hashluchjim on Nov 27 2011 Photos by Baruch EzaguiNew York, NY – When attending the annual conference of Chabad emissaries in New York, I am frequently tempted to contrast it with similar conventions whose attendees are mandated with securing the Jewish future. Particularly the Jewish Federations’ General Assembly comes to mind as it often takes place around the same time.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    Last year, following the Chabad conference, in an article entitled ‘Why Donors like Chabad,’ I pointed to a structure that secures almost immediate ROI for venture philanthropists free from red tape and bureaucracy. This year, surrounded by over 4000 emissaries at the grand banquet, I was inspired to expand on this idea from a different angle.

    Chabad’s rapid growth and unbridled success is undeniable, as Britain’s Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks expressed in his keynote address to the gathering, “You, the Shluchim (emissaries) are among the most important people in the Jewish world today.” Even for many of the other successful Jewish outreach groups that have emerged since the era of Chabad dominance, admittedly or not, it has been through a borrowed page from Chabad’s book. So what is the secret to Chabad’s success?

    Since as early as the Israelite slavery in Egypt, the greatest threat to Jewish continuity hasn’t been physical, but spiritual. Today, it is well known that far more Jews are lost to assimilation and out-marriage than to Islamic terror or any other threat.

    In dealing with this crisis, two divergent groups emerged among activists. One group, pioneered by the founders of the Haskala movement argued that Judaism had to be brought to the people. The laws needed to be loosened, and the rituals modified to suit the more cosmopolitan zeitgeist. For the Orthodox, the opposite was true. The only way to secure the Jewish future they argued was to double down, expel all external influences and distractions, and create closed communities of Jewish observance and tradition.

    The founders of the Chabad movement recognized the strengths and weaknesses in both schools of thought combing the ideologies in a winning formula. The Jewish principles of faith could never be diluted; after all, the process of dilution never ends. As such, Chabad maintains absolutist principles of authentic Jewish traditionalism. For some adherents they are practical, for others aspirational, but the core ideals are sacrosanct.

    However, Chabad vigorously opposes isolationism, and endeavors to hand-deliver its messages to every single Jew on whatever level of practice they are comfortable with. The flexibility is within the Jew, not within Judaism.

    Chabad has got it. Chabad has categorically answered all the questions and has understood the secret to guaranteeing the Jewish future. Now, their only focus is on the task at hand, getting the job done.

    It is interesting to note, that at most grand Jewish conventions, the vast majority of attendees are donors. Conferences and banquets are peppered with organization staff. At the Shluchim convention however, donors are by far in the minority, illustrating the centrality in Chabad of the mission over the means.

    Last Friday, commemorating three years since the horrific attacks on Mumbai that left a Chabad emissary and his wife dead, the Wall Street Journal ran an op-ed by Warren Kozak. He wrote, “In another community, the violent deaths of such a young and promising couple might have sent shivers through the leadership, prompting them to pull other emissaries from the field. But Chabad’s leadership did the opposite, immediately sending another couple to take their place,” This bold act demonstrated yet again the degree of commitment and dedication that the movement’s followers have ascribed to their mission.

    Investor Warren Buffett famously said, “Wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing.” Chabad donors understand exactly what they are doing.

    The Author is the director of the Algemeiner Journal and the GJCF and can be e-mailed at [email protected].


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    12 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    eighthcomment
    eighthcomment
    12 years ago

    True to Hashems message- they aren’t embarrassed or uncomfortable to teach the sheva mitzvot to bnei Noach- they know that as Jews they have a mission and excuses are just that- ain od Milvado

    yosefben
    yosefben
    12 years ago

    Baruch HaShem! Big chizuk for Shabbat…thanks for printing.

    vutvutvut
    vutvutvut
    12 years ago

    Great article. But people like Chabad because no matter what anyone says you just know that they are doing Gods work, and they are doing a darn good job.
    Kudos to all of you, may you go from strength to strength and continue your holy work which will surely bring Moshiach speedily in our days Amen.

    SandmanNY
    SandmanNY
    12 years ago

    May Agudas Yisrael, Young Israel, Chofetz Chaim, Aish HaTorah, Maimonides Project, and other lesser known kiruv organizations learn from this. For all the criticism Chabad gets from the Litvak world, the truth is that many of us who travel would have no place to eat, daven, or use a mikveh if Chabad weren’t there. I doubt we’ll ever see a Young Israel or Agudah congregation in Peru, Jaco Beach (Costa Rica), Mumbai, Phnom Pehn, Ho Chi Min City, Singapore, or 200 other places. But Chabad is there. Enough said.

    12 years ago

    I don’t see that it’s necessary for Agudah, YI, Aish, etc., to set up posts in Peru and Costa Rica to be effective and positive. There are plenty of worthwhile goals for Jewish organizations to take up, and they don’t all require the exact same outlook for them to achieve those goals while making a kiddush Hasehm. 70 faces has Torah–and importantly, all are valid, as long as they are truly Torah-dic. The Lubavitcher Rebbe’s philosophies and approach are surely one True face, but there are just as surely other True face, too.

    That being said, there sure are a lot of good things to learn from Chabad and a lot to give them kudos for! What’s wonderful about doing the avodah of the True Creator is that all faces are win-win!

    12 years ago

    So true and well written.
    Just totally amazing – and I don’t stop saying it.
    I believe the Litvaks know also – don’t knock them – might have taken some time but I know for a fact many Litvaks use Chabad’s services over and over.
    Yes true chizuk for shabbos indeed.

    cocoaman
    cocoaman
    12 years ago

    no credit to the Rebbe? for his unconditional love for EVERY jew that is felt to day by many of Chabad’s fans and donors.the fact that chabad houses still exist and arw constantly opening shows the Rebbe’s infinite power.

    cresthill
    cresthill
    12 years ago

    #4 has it right on. We should have tremendous hakores hatov for setting up Jewish resources in far-flung communities. We have no idea what “mesiras nefesh” is, having to raise kids where there is no yeshiva, no minyan of shomer shabbos people. They touch all Jews with their enthusiasm, warmth, and commitment.

    stamm
    stamm
    12 years ago

    Although I am in awe of the mesiras nefesh of the shluchim we must give credit where credit is due. I think their hatzlocho is due to their meshaleiach. Cannot explain it otherwise, he is poshut helping them!

    YJay1
    YJay1
    12 years ago

    Chabad really does a great job and Kol Haovod to them, but I have to take issue with this article. If you want to compliment Chabad, that’s beautiful but it doesn’t have to be at the expense of others. After reading this article you get the impression that ONLY Chabad has got it “right” and that everybody else has got it wrong. Don’t you you think that there are other Jews who have got it right? Is there only one correct way to serve Hashem?

    I think that even Chabtzkers would take issue with the way you describe their derech. Is Chabad some sort of mixture of Haskala and Orthodoxy? I always considered them to be plain Orthodox. You should apologize to Chabad for such a primitive and silly way of describing their beautiful Chassidus. Do you think their Rebbe’s didn’t have a better model but to copy from the Maskilim?

    tana-upalig
    tana-upalig
    12 years ago

    beautiful article, gut gezokt, a yasherkoach.