This week, on account of a meeting between the Satmar Rebbe and Senator Schumer a number of people commented negatively about the Senator. Their reasoning was that he is pro-abortion, pro-woke, pro-the nuclear deal with Iran, and various other prohibitions that he may violate.
Join our WhatsApp groupSubscribe to our Daily Roundup Email
Many invoke the verse in Tehillim (139:29), “Do I not hate them that hate You” that one should fully hate these evil doers.
What follows is not only a different perspective, but a perspective that many of the halachic sources indicate that we should, in fact, have toward our brethren who have, nebach, become evil-doers.
The pasuk in Bereishis says vayishlach yaakov malachim lefanav el aisav achiv – Yaakov sent messengers before him to Aisav, his brother.”
Don’t we know that Aisav was his brother? The Midrash Tanchuma HaYasan perek 4 answers that Yaakov acted toward him with brotherhood.
DEBATE IN THE TALMUD
No one argues that one should keep a distance from an evil-doer (See Rambam Hilchos Teshuva 4:5), and not looking at his countenance. But there is an argument about other aspects of evil-doers.
The verse in Dvarim (14:1) states, “Banim Atem Lashem Elokaichem – you are [all] sons to Hashem your G-d.” The Gemorah in Kiddushin (36a) cites a debate between Rabbi Yehudah and Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehudah says that this verse applies only when we behave properly. Rav Meir understands this verse as applying at all times even when we do not perform the will of Hashem. Rav Meir’s understanding is that this verse applies not only at all times but also to everyone – even Rashaim. Furthermore, it seems from the Rashba (Responsa Vol. I #194) that the final halacha is like Rav Meir in this regard, and not like Rabbi Yehudah.
With this in mind, we can now better understand a fascinating Kol Bo (Rabbi Greenwald 1189-1955) in the laws of Aveilus. He cites a ruling (p. 22) of the Maharshal on the following case:
A Rabbi is faced with two people who are on their deathbeds and both require the Rabbi to say Vidui with them. One of them is a righteous man. The other is an infamous evildoer. The Maharshal rules that the Rabbi should visit and tend to the needs of the evildoer. “Because he certainly needs the penance more.”
Both of the deathly ill patients are Hashem’s sons – even the evil one. Since they are Hashem’s children, and Hashem loves his children even if they do evil, it follows that we should also love them. If Hashem loves them and treats them as sons, shouldn’t we?
Indeed, the Chofetz Chaim cites Rabbi Yaakov Molin (Ahavas Chessed toward the end of the book subparagraph 28) that it is a Mitzvah to love the R’shaim – evil-doers. The Chofetz Chaim explains that when the Gemorah discusses hating evil-doers it is referring to only evil-doers who remain steadfast in their evil after having received proper rebuke. But nowadays no one knows how to give proper rebuke – therefore there is still a Mitzvah to love them.
The Chofetz Chaim brings proof to this position from a responsa of the Maharam Lublin (Siman 13). This is also the position of the Chazon Ish (Yore Deah 2:16, 28. See also Even HaEzer 118:6) who cites the Hagaos Maimanios to the same effect (Deyos chapter 6). The Binyan Tziyon (author of the Aruch haShulchan in a responsa) writes that in our times the entire issue of hating is not applicable because they should all be considered children who do not know otherwise.
Others suggest that the hating described in Tehillim is not a full hate, but rather a more subtle and partial emotion along those lines. They illustrate this understanding by citing other instances in the Talmud where that term is used more subtly.
HOW TO LOVE
In Sefer Orech L’Chaim (beginning of Parshas Noach) he writes as follows: “I had asked Rav Shmelka Nikolsberg how it is possible to love evil-doers. He responded that one must focus on the Neshama that lies within them, as it is a chailek elokah mimaal, a portion of the Divine from Above.”
Rav Yisroel Salanter zt”l suggested that each individual employ “Tachbulos” mental tricks in order to fool himself into the proper method of thinking. “Tachbulos” work differently for different people. My Rosh yeshiva, Rav henoch Liebowtz zt”l explained that since Tachbulos work so differently, Rav Salanter did not provide sample Tachbulos. Nonetheless, there is one that is enormously effective in developing a love for someone that may not have the most redeeming characteristics otherwise. Let us imagine that we are living in Nazi Germany chalilah. A Nazi is chasing you with a rifle in hand. If this person that we are having difficulty with were present – would he not save you and try to eliminate the Nazi? Of course he would. If this is the case, is it his fault that we are all not living in Nazi Germany? By the same token, if you were to have a flat tire in the middle of no where, would he not lend you ten dollars so that your flat can be changed? Of course he would. Is it then his fault that you, in fact, didn’t have a flat tire and din’t meet up with him?
The Tomer Dvorah (1:12) writes that it is proper to have mercy and compassion upon evil people and say, “At the end of it all he is a descendant of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob..” This too can be used as a tool to help eliminate our hate toward the evil-doer.
OTHER ISSUES
Rav Moshe Feinstein rules (Igros Moshe CM Vol. I #8) that even if someone is a Rasha it is still forbidden to sue him in a gentile court. Certainly it is clear from his writings that it would likewise be forbidden to damage him in other methods too. Thus, we should avoid incarcerating him (unless he is a clear and present danger to others), killing him or defacing or damaging hs property.
What about the concept of Arvus – that all members of Israel are responsible for one another? Does this apply to evil-doers? This happens to be a debate in Halacha, The Radbaz (Vol. I #187) and the Avnei Naizer (YD 126) write that there is no Arvus to an evil-doer. Rav Yitzchok Elchonon Spector (Ein Yitzchok EH 1:10) writes that there is Arvus to an evil-doer.
There is also a Mitzvah of correcting one’s fellow man called “Tochacha.” There is a debate as to whether this Mitzvah applies to evil-doers too. The Mishna Brurah (OC 608 in BH “Aval”) indicates that there is no Mitzvah. Rav Yoseph Teumim author of the Pri Magadim (Kuntrus Matan Scharan Shel Mitzvos III Chakirah 4) holds that there is, as does the author of the Maalos HaMidos (tenth Maalah).
CONCLUSIONS
It is clear from the above sources that even in regard to evil-doers, we need to gain some perspective. Cooler heads must prevail. They are still people and we have to realize that they are still sons of Hashem and have a chailek elokah mimaal – a Divine spark from above. We should also pray for the opening of their eyes and ultimately having them see the truth.
The author can be reached at [email protected]
The issue was the double standard the Rebbe has when meeting politicians in Israel. When it comes to Israel he claims that meeting Natanyahu and the likes, we give them courage and that they are Reshaim because they are not religious.
How is this different? Schumer is Jewish too and last I checked he belongs to the anti-religious party. How is supporting him not giving him courage etc etc..
WHEN will our Jewish leaders finally show that they have principles other than $$!! May it’s time we all did with less (smaller mosdos, fewer high profile trips around the world, smaller shuls, tischen, chasunas, etc) so that we don’t have to kiss up to people who oppose everything we are supposed to stand for???? What are peopel like me supposed to think if our leaders are wiilling to sell the Torah for a few dollars and others, like the author of this article, work hard to gather the sources to support the sell-out??? Why should I have any principles ? Why should I sacrifice for Torah???
This issue was the following VIN headline from 2020.
“Satmar Rebbe Attacks Vizhnitzer Rebbe For Netanyahu Meeting: ‘How Low Can
They Stoop’”
How is this different?
Schumer is a worm!!! Meeting him is bitul zman in its most basic and rudimentary form!
didnt the Chazon Ish refuse to look at the face of Ben Gurion due to his rishis?despite Ben Gurion being PM and in fact annuling the severe aveira of drafting orthodox Jewish women into the IDF so they can be utilized for immoral purposes? That was yaharog val yavor, what was discussed here some sewage project mainly?
Flattery is something that is a serious sin, as taught by our holy Torah.
This article makes no mention of that ancient prohibition, so it is therefore quite lacking.
As one of the great early authorities rules,ולא תחניפו את הארץ (Bamidbar 35:33) is a Biblical prohibition against flattery.
Flattery erodes and makes a mockery of truth, the seal of Hashem, one of the pillars on which the world manages to endure precariously.
I’m sure if they will vote for a republican instead of an demec-rat that are trying to bring down the city and state we would be better off and they will give them more $$$$$$ loads more
To categorize Senator Schumer as a Rasha is incorrect. (Tinok Shenishba may be a better term). He may support many causes and positions which we do not agree with, but he has been good to the Frum community over the decades, although it has not been popular with the rest of his party, and most recently was at the forefront for Alta Fixler.
In any case the guide for relations with even Reshoim is that of Rabbenu Yonah,as quoted by R’ Reuven Grozovsky in his Bayis Hazman, )which is generally accepted to be the position of most Gedolei Yisrael, in regards to the working relationship of the Agudah with the State of Israel), where he writes of the concept of maintaining a relationship, even with figures who are not as accommodating to our positions as Senator Schumer is. New York will not be electing a Republican senator anytime soon, so it is incumbent to work with local officials, no matter their persuasion
That is one of the best photos I have seen in a long time.