Former Top Israeli Legal Officials Oppose Judicial Overhaul

4
Israeli lawyers wave the national flag during a protest against the government's plans to overhaul the country's legal system outside the District Court in Tel Aviv, Israel, Thursday, Jan. 12, 2023. The new government unveiled its plan last week, proposing changes that critics say will weaken the country's judiciary and imperil its democratic system of checks and balances. (AP Photo/Oded Balilty)

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Former top Israeli legal officials spoke out Thursday against sweeping changes to the country’s justice system planned by the new conservative government, lending their voices to a growing outcry against the proposed overhaul.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Seven former attorneys general who have served in the post throughout the last five decades signed a letter of protest, along with four other former senior legal officials. Three of the former attorneys general were appointed under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose current justice minister is spearheading the legal overhaul. The letter, published in Israeli media, denounced the proposed changes, saying they are destructive to the country’s legal system.

“We call on the government to withdraw the proposed plan and prevent the serious harm to the justice system and the rule of law,” the letter said.

The former officials said the changes would turn the Supreme Court, often the last recourse for Israelis and Palestinians seeking to challenge what they see as discriminatory policies, into a “pseudo-political body that would be suspected of bending the law in favor of the government.”

Israel’s new government has made overhauling the country’s legal system a centerpiece of its agenda. It wants to weaken the Supreme Court, allowing lawmakers to pass laws the court has struck down with a simple majority in parliament. Other changes include politicizing the appointment of judges, reducing the independence of government legal advisors or ignoring their counsel.

The legal changes could help Netanyahu, who is on trial for corruption, evade conviction, or even make his trial disappear entirely. Since being indicted in 2019, Netanyahu has railed publicly against the justice system, calling it biased against him. He says the legal overhaul will be carried out responsibly.

The plan has prompted an uproar over what critics say is a major threat to the country’s democratic fundamentals. The country’s current attorney general has already fiercely criticized the proposed changes and a protest against them last week drew thousands. Alan Dershowitz, a staunch Israel defender, has also come out against the plan, saying were he in Israel he would be joining the demonstrations.

Critics accuse the government of declaring war against the legal system, saying the plan will upend Israel’s system of checks and balances and undermine its democratic institutions by giving absolute power to the most right-wing coalition in the country’s history. The government says the overhaul is a necessary step to streamline governance and correct an imbalance that has granted the legal system too much sway.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


4 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Former NY
Former NY
1 year ago

When courts start to dictate snd manufacture laws on there own you have a real problem with democracy. They’ve taken to power if the people away and an extremist few are now the rulers. They are self appointed

Cheski B
Cheski B
1 year ago

You don’t like it, next time win elections.

Educated Archy
Educated Archy
1 year ago

 “critics say is a major threat to the country’s democratic fundamentals”.

No you have it all wrong AP fake news libs.

A democracy fundamentals are that free elections by the people empower their representitives to decide what’s law not the courts. The courts are used by dictators to cover up crimes. if Iran wants to sentence a protestor to death, they just march hum thru a sham court. Same with russia etc. The court judges are puppets. Freely elected officals making choices are democracy.

Even in the USA, when the court for exmaple threw out Roe v Wade, they exlplcitly said if congress makes a new law for abortion then we have no jursidiction . We only had jurisdiction because roe v wade to begin with was a court decision. I am sure Phineas and Charles the covid maniac will have some legal jargon and distinction to add, but thats the idea.

So no this is democracy.