In Stunning Testimony, Former FBI Official Says J6 Pipe Bomber Could Not Be Located Due to ‘Corrupted Phone Data’

WASHINGTON DC (VINnews) — A startling development was revealed regarding the January 6th Capitol riots.

The FBI’s failure to capture the person who placed pipe bombs at political party headquarters in Washington the night before the riot is (at least partly) due to corrupted geolocation data from a cellphone provider.

At least that is what Steven D’Antuono, former assistant director of the FBI Washington Field Office, is claiming, and he added that he does not want “any conspiracy theories”.

This bombshell, along with several others, came directly from the testimony of D’Antuono in Congress. A large reason these earth-shattering details have come to light are thanks to Revolver News’ Darren Beattie, who has been relentlessly pursuing the truth about January 6th for two and a half years.

In fact, Beattie worked with GOP Congressional leaders to develop questions regarding the pipe bomb investigation for D’Antuono to answer. A letter recently published by Jim Jordan alludes to some of the stunning results of that interrogation.

D’Antuono once led the pipe bomb investigation, and he said agents noticed a smartphone in the suspect’s hand in surveillance videos.

D’Antuono has long been a focus of Revolver News, for his oversight of the investigation into the alleged kidnapping plot of Michigan Governor Whitmer, as well as the investigation into the alleged January 6 pipe bombs.

It is common practice for law enforcement to use geo-fencing technology to learn the identity of a suspect based on their location. In fact the FBI has utilized this technology to catch many Jan. 6th suspects. Why was it not used to locate the alleged pipe bomber?

As reported in Revolver: “According to Jordan’s letter, Congressman Thomas Massie asked D’Antuono whether they attempted to identify the pipe bomber via geofencing, and received the following shocking answer: the data was corrupted! The telecom company just by sheer coincidence happened to lose the data for that particular place and time!”

D’Antuono testified: “We did a complete geofence. We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers, not purposely by them, right…and it wasn’t purposely corrupted. I don’t want any conspiracy theories, right. To my knowledge, it wasn’t corrupted, you know, but that could have been good information that we don’t have, right. So that is painful for us not to have that. So we looked at everything.”

Revolver continued: “What a quote for the ages: the dog ate the geofencing data that just happened to be critical to identifying this mysterious pipe bomber. It’s an “unusual circumstance” and he “doesn’t want any conspiracy theories.” Right Mr. D’Antuono, right.”

Mr. D’Antuono was also asked whether the pipe bombs had live explosives or whether they were decoys. Mr. D’Antuono acknowledged that despite reports that the bombs were viable, in his estimation they were not set to go-off as the kitchen timer attached to the devices could not have detonated them. In a critical concession, D’Antuono admitted that “the timer used on the pipe bomb could not have detonated the pipe bomb on January 6th, given the time already elapsed between placement and discovery.”

The Revolved story concluded: “It’s time to demand the answers that the American people deserve; no matter how dark, no matter how damning. Stay tuned. This thing is going to get a lot uglier.”