Washington – TSA Chief Insists No Change In Screening Policy

    6

    Washington – The head of the Transportation Security Administration on Sunday acknowledged that new full-body scanners and thorough pat-downs can be invasive and uncomfortable, but he said that the need to stay a step ahead of terrorists rules out changes in airport screening procedures.

    Join our WhatsApp group

    Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


    John Pistole told CNN’s “State of the Union” that, despite the public uproar over new screening techniques, “we are not changing the policies” that he said were the best ways of keeping the traveling public safe. TSA screeners, he said, are “the last line of defense” in protecting air travelers.

    Pistole’s comments came after President Barack Obama on Saturday said he understood people’s frustrations and had asked TSA officials whether there’s a less intrusive way to screen U.S. airline passengers.

    Obama said he had told the agency that “you have to constantly refine and measure whether what we’re doing is the only way to assure the American people’s safety.”

    Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said she thought “everyone, including our security experts, are looking for ways to diminish the impact on the traveling public.” She told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that “striking the right balance is what this is about.”

    However, when asked on CBS’ “Face the Nation” if she would submit to a pat-down, Clinton responded: “Not if I could avoid it. No. I mean, who would?”

    But Pistole stressed that that balance now requires steps to confront “a determined enemy” that has proven adept in devising new ways to conceal weapons. “We know through intelligence there are determined people, terrorists, trying to kill not only Americans but innocent people around the world,” he said.

    Pistole was shown videos of people being patted down where the screeners touched the breasts of a woman, felt into the pants of another person and felt the crotch of a man. He said all three cases were proper and that the gloves of the screener who felt inside the pants were then tested for explosive trace residue.

    A Nigerian man was accused last Christmas of trying to set off a bomb hidden in his underwear aboard a flight from Amsterdam.

    “Clearly it’s invasive, it’s not comfortable,” Pistole said, while adding that very few people receive the pat-down. People who go through the new advanced imaging machines available at some 70 airports are usually not subject to pat-downs, he said.

    Passengers have also objected to the advanced imaging machines because they produce a virtually naked image of the person’s body. The screener, who sits in a different location, does not see the face of the person being screened and does not know the traveler’s identity.

    “Clearly, if we are to detect terrorists who have proven innovative, creative in the design and implementation of bombs that are going to blow up airplanes and kill people, we have to do something to prevent that,” Pistole said.


    Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

    iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

    Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


    Connect with VINnews

    Join our WhatsApp group


    6 Comments
    Most Voted
    Newest Oldest
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    festayid
    festayid
    13 years ago

    Kudos to Pistole,Obama,and Hillary for putting Americas safety first and not succumbing to stupid peoples problem with these great machines

    SandmanNY
    SandmanNY
    13 years ago

    Worst yet – the long-term effects of the radiation emitted by these machines has not been empirically demonstrated or validated. If you travel once a year, maybe no big deal. If you travel weekly – or like airline personnel – several times a week, the cumulative effect could be an issue. As I said elsewhere, this is reactive security. It surely wouldn’t detect something inserted in a body cavity or surgically implanted – which is already being test run by the bad guys. So what then? Everyone gets really strip searched? Follow the Israeli example. Profiling works. PC people don’t.

    13 years ago

    Why can’t they just have machines and dogs that can sniff explosives

    Anonymous
    Anonymous
    13 years ago

    The TSA chief is a professional and he is right. Until they have a better option, keep on using he machines. Anyone who doesn’t like it or the pat downs TOO BAD. Stay at home and don’t fly since they will not change the policy until they have better options.