Chief Justice Roberts Declines To Read Question On Whistleblower

8
In this image from video, presiding officer Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts looks at a question submitted by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., before declining to read the question as written during the impeachment trial against President Donald Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 30 2020. (Senate Television via AP)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Chief Justice John Roberts has declined to read an impeachment trial question by Republican Sen. Rand Paul about the intelligence community whistleblower whose complaint led to the impeachment investigation into President Donald Trump.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


Paul, of Kentucky, has said he believes that the whistleblower may have conspired with House staff aides in writing the August whistleblower complaint.

“The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted,” Roberts announced. The chief justice did not say what was in the note.

Earlier, Roberts’ staff communicated to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s staff that Roberts did not want to read the whistleblower’s name, according to a Republican familiar with the situation who wasn’t authorized to speak on the record.

Paul said on Twitter after Roberts declined to read his note that the question involved “whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings.” That was a reference to House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who led the impeachment inquiry.

Paul left the Senate impeachment proceeding to hold a news conference on the topic. He claimed his question was not aimed at outing the whistleblower.

“I don’t know who the whistleblower is. Adam Schiff doesn’t know who the whistleblower is. My question’s not about the whistleblower,” Paul said. “My question’s about two people who were friends who worked together at the National Security Council who have been overheard talking about impeaching the president years in advance.”

U.S. whistleblower laws exist to protect the identity and careers of people who bring forward accusations of wrongdoing by government officials. Lawmakers in both parties have historically backed those protections.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hal McIntire
Hal McIntire
4 years ago

Life jobs for SCOTUS has to be amended. This dingbat upheld Obamacare and now he’s shilling for Chucky Jewmer & Co.
Get him out of there!!! 

Matt Dillon
Matt Dillon
4 years ago

Take your gown off, Justice. Imagine– In our country, a weasel who wants to destroy a president cannot be named, nor questioned, nor seen. A shadow accuser working with elected federal lawmakers and cannot be cross examined. Resign…!!! you’re a Washington swamp disgrace.

Bugsy Siegel
Bugsy Siegel
4 years ago

He’s not legally a whistleblower but a leaker who is known to have plotted to take our president down. He’s a liar , else the Dems wouldn’t have to hide him. Shame on Roberts.

Disappointed
Disappointed
4 years ago

Kavanaugh is also a Rino phony liberal as well. He is far from being a conservative.

nd
nd
4 years ago

What happened multiple leave from the mental hospital and the first thing to voz is neias, all three of you don’t forget your medicine

Train buskers
Train buskers
4 years ago

At least we don’t tramp in the subways and airplanes like nd.