Judge Restores NY Democratic Presidential Primary On June 23

2
In this Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2020 file photograph, presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden gestures during a foreign policy statement in New York. On Tuesday, a federal judge restored New York's Democratic presidential primary slated for June 23, after ruling that eliminating it was unconstitutional. (AP Photo/File, Richard Drew)

NEW YORK (AP) — The New York Democratic presidential primary must take place June 23 because canceling it would be unconstitutional, a judge ruled Tuesday.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in Manhattan ruled after hearing arguments a day earlier as lawyers for withdrawn presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Andrew Yang argued that it was wrong to cancel the primary.

The judge said there was enough time before the primary occurs to figure out how to carry it out safely.

“If all but one of the presidential candidates are removed from the ballot and the primary is not held, Delegate Plaintiffs will be deprived of the opportunity to compete for delegate slots and shape the course of events at the Convention, and voters will lose the chance to express their support for delegates who share their views, the judge wrote. “The loss of these First Amendment rights is a heavy hardship.”

She added: “There is also a strong public interest in permitting the presidential primary to proceed with the full roster of qualified candidates.”

The Democratic members of the State’s Board of Elections voted to cancel the primary even though New York was still planning to hold its congressional and state-level primaries June 23.

They cited the danger to voters from the coronavirus as a reason to cancel the election since former Vice President Joe Biden has been endorsed by the major candidates he had faced.

New York state Democratic party chair Jay Jacobs said: “We are reviewing it.”

Jacobs had called holding the primary “unnecessary” with the suspension of Sanders’ campaign and said reduced turnout could reduce the need for as many poll workers.

Lawyers who argued before Torres on Monday did not immediately return calls seeking comment.


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


2 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
anonymous
anonymous
4 years ago

If u get coronation, pick Susan Rice as VP.
Susan the station to station hopper lying about Benghazi on orders from Obama and crooked Hillary.
This shameless liar will take over when you get dizzy. She’s a woman and 1/2 black. Should be good enough.

The system is broken
The system is broken
4 years ago

This is just another example of the corrupt one party system we have in this Country. The “Democrat” party and the “Republican” party is a myth. It’s all one corrupt party. The US is controlled by a few dug in bureaucrats that make up the deep state. These corrupt thugs have no problem disenfranchising millions of voters. Voters are worthless. Votes are worthless and disregarded. Every 4 years, on so-called election night, Californians know their vote means nothing, is totally worthless, and has zero effect on the outcome. The fact that we have a deep state controlling us little taxpayers, became abundantly clear during the impeachment hearings a few months ago. But to take away our right to vote is an outrage that should anger every American!