Israel’s Health Minister: Overturning Roe v. Wade Would Be ‘A Fatal Blow To Human Rights’

8
Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz pictured on August 13, 2021. (Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90)

JERUSALEM (JTA) – Among the many people condemning a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade is one who is working to make abortion more accessible for Jews in Israel.

Join our WhatsApp group

Subscribe to our Daily Roundup Email


“A woman’s right over her body — hers alone. Including a decision to terminate the pregnancy. If the U.S. Supreme Court takes the leader of the free world back 50 years, it will be a fatal blow to human rights,” Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz said in a statement posted to Twitter Tuesday.

Horowitz’s statement represented a rare direct interjection into American domestic policy by an Israeli official, but it was also consistent with efforts by the lawmaker, who leads the liberal Meretz party, to change Israeli abortion rules.

Horowitz added, “In the meantime, we are moving forward, correcting in the Ministry of Health the archaic procedures designed to prevent women from choosing, and leaving the decision in their hands.”

Israel legalized abortions in 1977 — four years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade enshrined the right to abortion in the United States. Since then, even as religion looms large in Israel, no significant movement to outlaw abortion has taken root there. In 2014, lawmakers signed off on allowing government funds to pay for abortions.

But Horowitz and others say the required process to obtain an abortion infringes on women’s autonomy. That’s because any Israeli woman who wants to terminate a pregnancy must demonstrate to a three-person committee that having the baby will cause her emotional or physical harm, or that the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest.

More than 99% of requests are approved. (Some people who are pregnant reportedly circumvent the policy by pursuing unapproved abortions from willing doctors.) Still, the requirement has long been a target for liberal politicians and advocates who say women should be permitted to make the decision to end a pregnancy without getting anyone’s approval.

“Israel’s policy sends a message to women that while the state will facilitate our abortions in practice, it refuses – in principle — to grant us the freedom to make that decision ourselves,” the journalist Mairav Zonzsein wrote in the New York Times in 2015, after having a committee-approved abortion. “And that is an infringement of our basic rights to bodily integrity and privacy.”

Horowitz called the policy “chauvinistic” shortly after his appointment last year and said he would try to change it.

“It should be a given — the rights to a woman’s body are the woman’s alone,” he said at the time. “Any decision or medical procedure such as the choice of whether to perform an abortion must be in the hands of the woman. We have no moral right to decide for her how to deal with an unwanted pregnancy.”


Listen to the VINnews podcast on:

iTunes | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Podbean | Amazon

Follow VINnews for Breaking News Updates


Connect with VINnews

Join our WhatsApp group


8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Moshe
Moshe
2 years ago

He is so worried about human rights. How about a baby’s right not to be murdered?

Moshe
Moshe
2 years ago

Why does he have to push his nose? Is he the minister of health in America? Tipesh

zlate1
zlate1
2 years ago

This man is a poster child for moral failure

His appointment to a post where he can and does try fo destroy this country’s morals just shows how corrupt this coalition really is.

anonymous
anonymous
2 years ago

Shoitah, don’t you have enough problems in Israel, if you have time on your hands then you’re doing something very wrong considering everything facing Israel, as we speak, if your hands are full with issues and problems facing Israel, today, then why are you mixing into stuff that doesn’t pertain to you, whatsoever.

Lazer
Lazer
2 years ago

I guess that he has NOT read the draft. All that was written was that abortion is NOT a constitutional right. It is up to each state to determine whether abortion procedures can be done it each state and under what conditions. The public can vote representatives who agree with their opinion/belief. THAT’S the democratic way.

LiberalsPlayBook
LiberalsPlayBook
2 years ago

A monster in human skin. His mother should have aborted him.

Robert
Robert
2 years ago

If Americans should keep their noses out of Israeli politics because they don’t understand their system, that goes double for Israelis commenting on the American system.
Overturning RvW does NOT restrict abortions in any way. It simply returns control over abortion laws to the states where the citizens of each state get to decide what is right for them. Some states will limit, some states won’t but that’s the people’s choice.
It has nothing to do with human rights.